Musculoskeletal images. Femoral fracture in adult osteogenesis imperfecta.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 42-year-old woman with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) fell and had immediate pain in her right thigh. Before this, she was occasionally ambulatory, using 2 canes to walk short distances. She had had multiple fractures as a child, undergoing intramedullary nailing of both her femurs and tibias, but as an adult had sustained only a single fracture 17 years previously, requiring fixation of a right femoral neck fracture with a Richards hip screw (Smith & Nephew Richards). She was of short stature and had extreme varus bowing of both lower extremities. She was in severe pain and could not move her right lower extremity. The injured limb was slightly larger than the contralateral limb; however, both had a significant amount of adipose tissue. Further examination revealed multiple surgical scars along the length of the femur. Motor and sensory examinations of her right foot and ankle were normal, and there were strong symmetrical pulses. Radiographs revealed a transverse fracture distal to the previous hip screw implant (Fig. 1). The femur had a severe varus bow. The bone was osteopenic and the cortices were extremely thin. FIG. 1. Admission anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) radiographs of the femur in a 46-year-old woman with osteogenesis imperfecta. Internal fixation devices for proximal femoral fractures are in place. Figure 1. Continued With modern medical and surgical treatment of children with OI, we now commonly see fractures in adults with OI. These are often the result of minor trauma. The disease process in the patient presented here posed several difficulties for treatment. The patient was too heavy and the femoral canal was too large for most of the traditional flexible nailing and wiring techniques used in pediatrics, and too narrow and fragile for nails used in adult femoral fractures. In this patient, the severe bowing of her leg, the fragility of her bone as well as the small diameter and length of the femoral canal were important. It was impossible to use a traditional femoral intramedullary nail, so a flexible humeral nail was used for internal fixation of her femur (Flexnail; Synthes, Canada*). This nail is composed of intercalated segments that allow 5° of motion at each link. After insertion of the nail into the intramedullary canal of a long bone, an internal cable system within the nail is tightened. This action compresses the segments and diminishes the motion at each segment, thus increasing the rigidity of the nail. This nail is intended for use in acute and pathologic fractures of the humerus. It can be inserted in antegrade and retrograde fashion. It comes in 2 diameters, 7.5 and 9.0 mm, and standard lengths 180–300 mm. The nail has a potential 30ο bend to facilitate off-axis insertion. Because of its small diameter and flexibility during insertion, the nail theoretically can be inserted into a varus bowed femur having a small diameter canal without breaching the opposite cortex. The diaphyseal screws of the patient's hip implant were removed through a previous lateral incision. Next, a distal anteromedial approach to the femur was chosen for the entry point of the nail allowing a 30ο angulation of the nail to the long axis of the femur. An awl was used to open the canal medially. The bone was very fragile, as in most OI patients, receiving medical therapy with bisphosphonates. The canal was reamed by hand using 6- and 8-mm reamers (Synream; Synthes Canada). A guide wire was placed in the canal until it reached the previous hip screw. The canal was reamed further using the 8.5-mm reamer. At all times fluoroscopy was used to ensure the canal was not breached. A 7.5-mm х 210-mm flexible humeral nail was inserted (Fig. 2) from an anteromedial insertion point in the distal femur. The tensioning bolt was inserted to stiffen the nail. Stiffening the nail also functioned to realign the fracture fragments. After this, a distal transverse locking bolt was inserted. The small peripheral wires of the nail were advanced in a bouquet fashion for proximal fixation. Radiologically and clinically, the fracture was stable both rotationally and axially. Postoperative radiographs revealed a well-aligned femur (Fig. 3). FIG. 2. Insertion of the flexible humeral nail through an anteromedial incision in distal femur. IH = insertion handle with locking bolt insertion screwdriver in place. FIG. 3. Postoperative radiographs showing the flexible humeral nail in the femur. Tightening of the nail locking mechanism partially corrected the varus deformity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".