Ectopic Pregnancy and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ectopic Pregnancy -Modern Diagnosis and Management 46 2. Methods Identification and eligibility of relevant studiesMedline searches (up to March 2011) were performed using various combinations of terms: ectopic pregnancy, heterotopic pregnancy, In Vitro Fertilization, Intrauterine Insemination, pelvic inflammatory disease, Chlamydia trachomatis, heterotopic pregnancy, cervical pregnancy, cost-effectiveness.The search was complemented with perusal of the bibliographies of retrieved papers and review articles.We included studies that evaluated the presence of an ectopic pregnancy after IVF in case reports, although in other chapters information was obtained from studies in the general population.Number of tested samples was not an exclusion criterion.Only studies including human subjects were included. Data extractionFor each study, information was obtained on authors, journal, year of publication, country and years of study enrollment, study design and study target, number of tested samples, tissue and disease tested, searched molecules and pathways involved, clinical outcome and whether biopsy was performed with the site.Data extraction was performed independently by two investigators, and conflicts were resolved after discussion. Main outcomes Statistical methodsFrequencies of all important parameters were performed.Statistical analyses were performed in using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Founding sourceNo sponsor was involved in the study design, report writing, or paper submission. Results Studies examining biological factors playing a role to ectopic pregnancyA total of 42 abstracts were retrieved and further screened.Only studies that performed basic investigations were included in this part.Out of 20 included studies, 3 were performed in USA (15%), 2 in Germany (10%), Israel, Sweden and UK, and from one (5%) in Brazil, Canada, China, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, India and Poland.8 (40%) of them considered themselves clinical, 8 (40%) experimental, 1 (5%) prospective, 1 (5%) as pilot study, 1 (1%) as preliminary report, 1 (5%) as hypothesis testing.The type of study per country initiated can be seen in Fig 1.All studies selected used human tissue.Five studies used fallopian tubes (25%).From the other studies 1 (5%) used fallopian tube and peripheral blood, 1 used deciduas, placenta, primary first trimester trophoblast cells and peripheral blood, 1 used decidual tissue, 2 endometrial tissue, 1 epithelial tissue and 1 mucosal tissue, 1 cervical specimen and www.intechopen.comEctopic Pregnancy and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review 47 Fig. 2. Type of study per tissue used when examining biological factors in ectopic pregnancy fallopian tube samples, 1 used human endometrium and fallopian tube, 2 used human placental tissue, 1 used ovarian, prostate, endometrial, tubal and semen, 1 used trophoblast, 2 used serum samples, 1 used transervical specimens and one used stimulated cervical mononuclear cell supernatants.The type of study per tissue used can be seen in Fig 2.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».