Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Investigations against drug crimes are hard to prosecute because evidences cannot easily grasp without insiders' report within the drug criminal organization. Without any doubt, drug crimes are used to be covertly committed on the entire process of its producing, possessing, trading and international transferring. The Korean government performs the Monetary Reward Program in order to encourage the voluntary criminal report against drug crimes. The Monetary Reward Program is a system of giving a reward to reporters within the range of fifty-million won for individuals and ten-million won for the public officials. Insofar, the Monetary Reward Program has been an effective solution for the investigation of drug crimes, however, it reveals a serious shortcoming due to insufficient funds for rewards. The reward fund of the Monetary Reward Program is allocated by limited budgets of the National Treasury. Therefore, it is important to establish both a sufficient funding and a flexible allocation plan for improving an effectiveness of the Monetary Reward Program. In this sense, this study suggests the Asset Forfeiture Fund based on establishing a system of the Civil Forfeiture. To begin with, the Asset Forfeiture Fund is recommended by international organization, such as the FATF (Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering). This act has been operated by seven nations - e.g., U.S., Canada, Australia, Italy, Luxemburg, Spain - among FATF member nations. Basically, this funding plan aims at flexible sharing a common financial resource between the state and the local government or the international organization. This would enhance opportunities to budget toward law enforcement projects, rehabilitation facilities, investigations and rewards in relevant to drug crimes. Moreover, this plan makes expedite a mutual relationship between the state government and the international organization or the local government. In advance to the introduction of the Asset Forfeiture Fund, it is necessary to be concerned with the Civil Forfeiture. The system of the civil forfeiture is discerned from the current forfeiture one in respect of operating by the court order without any violations of private property rights. Instead of concluding remarks, this study recommends two more things along with a guarantee of sufficient financial resources toward an effective operation of the Monetary Reward Program. The system of the protection of drug crime reporters should be fortified in various specific crime acts. Amending regulations of the testimonial immunity for accomplice witness and introducing the Plea Bargaining are both urged.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle