Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigations against drug crimes are hard to prosecute because evidences cannot easily grasp without insiders' report within the drug criminal organization. Without any doubt, drug crimes are used to be covertly committed on the entire process of its producing, possessing, trading and international transferring. The Korean government performs the Monetary Reward Program in order to encourage the voluntary criminal report against drug crimes. The Monetary Reward Program is a system of giving a reward to reporters within the range of fifty-million won for individuals and ten-million won for the public officials. Insofar, the Monetary Reward Program has been an effective solution for the investigation of drug crimes, however, it reveals a serious shortcoming due to insufficient funds for rewards. The reward fund of the Monetary Reward Program is allocated by limited budgets of the National Treasury. Therefore, it is important to establish both a sufficient funding and a flexible allocation plan for improving an effectiveness of the Monetary Reward Program. In this sense, this study suggests the Asset Forfeiture Fund based on establishing a system of the Civil Forfeiture. To begin with, the Asset Forfeiture Fund is recommended by international organization, such as the FATF (Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering). This act has been operated by seven nations - e.g., U.S., Canada, Australia, Italy, Luxemburg, Spain - among FATF member nations. Basically, this funding plan aims at flexible sharing a common financial resource between the state and the local government or the international organization. This would enhance opportunities to budget toward law enforcement projects, rehabilitation facilities, investigations and rewards in relevant to drug crimes. Moreover, this plan makes expedite a mutual relationship between the state government and the international organization or the local government. In advance to the introduction of the Asset Forfeiture Fund, it is necessary to be concerned with the Civil Forfeiture. The system of the civil forfeiture is discerned from the current forfeiture one in respect of operating by the court order without any violations of private property rights. Instead of concluding remarks, this study recommends two more things along with a guarantee of sufficient financial resources toward an effective operation of the Monetary Reward Program. The system of the protection of drug crime reporters should be fortified in various specific crime acts. Amending regulations of the testimonial immunity for accomplice witness and introducing the Plea Bargaining are both urged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it