Notice bibliographique
Résumé
William Beard, The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2006. xii+568pp. cdn $35.00 (pbk).Michael GrantWilliam Beard's revised and expanded paperback edition of his earlier hardback study of David Cronenberg, first published in 2001, runs to over 560 pages and gives an account of the films in chronological order, beginning with Stereo (Canada 1969) and ending with two additional chapters on eXistenZ (Canada/ UK 1999) and Spider (Canada/UK 2002). In his preface, the author makes clear what is not to be looked for in his book. He has, he tells us, made no attempt to examine the processes of development or evolution whereby individual films came into existence, nor is he concerned with special effects or with any of the technological aspects pertinent to the films. He also makes it clear that he has no pressing interest in what he calls 'the process of aesthetic evaluation' (xi). In this he sees himself as aligned with what he calls 'the current practice of most scholarly writing on film' (xi). What Beard offers as his major undertaking with respect to Cronenberg's work is the delineation of what he calls 'a huge moral and ethical struggle underlying the surface of the films' (xi). This conflation of the moral and ethical takes place around the notion of transgression; the films in their very delineation of transgressive desire confront the ethical or human cost of that transgression, the effects of transgression on others. For Beard, the films come to identify transgression and its deleterious effects with male heterosexual sadistic desire. His argument is that the male subject, such as Max Renn (James Woods) in Videodrome (Canada 1983), comes to see himself finally as an ethical monstrosity, a monstrosity whose ultimate expression is the eruption, in the form of an abject biological metamorphosis, of the subject's own flesh. The final condition of self-understanding reached by the monstrous male subject is suicidal melancholy. For Cronenberg, as Beard presents him, this is a project resulting not only in moral and ethical monstrosity, but is also the project of artistic creation as such. Examples of artists thus understood include Beverly Mantle (Jeremy Irons), Rene Gallimard (Jeremy Irons), Seth Brundle (Jeff Goldblum) and, crucially, writer William Lee (Peter Weller) in Naked Lunch (Canada/UK/Japan 1991). In any event, it is this convergence of themes that led Beard to entitle his book The Artist as Monster.Beard's method is one of interpretation and exposition. He works through each film, covering the narrative events, characterisations and the themes emerging from the narrative and character interactions, before proceeding to describe relevant features of mise-en-scene and style. This leads to a questionable separation of style from meaning. Not only that, but things can soon become tedious. It is easy to get bogged down in the elaborate detail of relations between characters, or, in the case of Naked Lunch, typewriters, and to lose sight of where the argument is meant to be heading. Beard's interpretations draw on the language of psychoanalysis, employing terms such as perversion, sado-masochism, abjection, and so on, and yet the psychoanalytic terminology remains just that: terminology. The accounts of characters read too often like pieces of amateur psychologising, and issues of a rather different order of significance never quite come into focus. One can see this in Beard's use of the word 'abjection'. The theoretical investment in the word derives, of course, from Julia Kristeva and has been applied to cinema by, amongst others, Barbara Creed. Beard employs it with some frequency, working it especially hard in his account of the novels of William Burroughs in the chapter on Naked Lunch. Beard cites a number of passages from the writings, all of them depicting scenes of the atrocious ravaging of the bodies of boys during the course of acts of extreme sexual violation, usually involving the deaths of the boys by hanging. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».