MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585402890

The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg (review)

2009· article· en· W1585402890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Fiction Film & Television · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonsterMovie theaterOrder (exchange)Art historyArtDraculaSociologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

William Beard, The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2006. xii+568pp. cdn $35.00 (pbk).Michael GrantWilliam Beard's revised and expanded paperback edition of his earlier hardback study of David Cronenberg, first published in 2001, runs to over 560 pages and gives an account of the films in chronological order, beginning with Stereo (Canada 1969) and ending with two additional chapters on eXistenZ (Canada/ UK 1999) and Spider (Canada/UK 2002). In his preface, the author makes clear what is not to be looked for in his book. He has, he tells us, made no attempt to examine the processes of development or evolution whereby individual films came into existence, nor is he concerned with special effects or with any of the technological aspects pertinent to the films. He also makes it clear that he has no pressing interest in what he calls 'the process of aesthetic evaluation' (xi). In this he sees himself as aligned with what he calls 'the current practice of most scholarly writing on film' (xi). What Beard offers as his major undertaking with respect to Cronenberg's work is the delineation of what he calls 'a huge moral and ethical struggle underlying the surface of the films' (xi). This conflation of the moral and ethical takes place around the notion of transgression; the films in their very delineation of transgressive desire confront the ethical or human cost of that transgression, the effects of transgression on others. For Beard, the films come to identify transgression and its deleterious effects with male heterosexual sadistic desire. His argument is that the male subject, such as Max Renn (James Woods) in Videodrome (Canada 1983), comes to see himself finally as an ethical monstrosity, a monstrosity whose ultimate expression is the eruption, in the form of an abject biological metamorphosis, of the subject's own flesh. The final condition of self-understanding reached by the monstrous male subject is suicidal melancholy. For Cronenberg, as Beard presents him, this is a project resulting not only in moral and ethical monstrosity, but is also the project of artistic creation as such. Examples of artists thus understood include Beverly Mantle (Jeremy Irons), Rene Gallimard (Jeremy Irons), Seth Brundle (Jeff Goldblum) and, crucially, writer William Lee (Peter Weller) in Naked Lunch (Canada/UK/Japan 1991). In any event, it is this convergence of themes that led Beard to entitle his book The Artist as Monster.Beard's method is one of interpretation and exposition. He works through each film, covering the narrative events, characterisations and the themes emerging from the narrative and character interactions, before proceeding to describe relevant features of mise-en-scene and style. This leads to a questionable separation of style from meaning. Not only that, but things can soon become tedious. It is easy to get bogged down in the elaborate detail of relations between characters, or, in the case of Naked Lunch, typewriters, and to lose sight of where the argument is meant to be heading. Beard's interpretations draw on the language of psychoanalysis, employing terms such as perversion, sado-masochism, abjection, and so on, and yet the psychoanalytic terminology remains just that: terminology. The accounts of characters read too often like pieces of amateur psychologising, and issues of a rather different order of significance never quite come into focus. One can see this in Beard's use of the word 'abjection'. The theoretical investment in the word derives, of course, from Julia Kristeva and has been applied to cinema by, amongst others, Barbara Creed. Beard employs it with some frequency, working it especially hard in his account of the novels of William Burroughs in the chapter on Naked Lunch. Beard cites a number of passages from the writings, all of them depicting scenes of the atrocious ravaging of the bodies of boys during the course of acts of extreme sexual violation, usually involving the deaths of the boys by hanging. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience Fiction Film & TelevisionSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207