MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1594345520

Toni Morrison's Quarrel with the Civil Rights Ideology in Love

2007· article· en· W1594345520 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gurumurthy Neelakantan, Sathyaraj Venkatesan

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational fiction review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRace, History, and American Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTrilogyPoliticsIdeologyWhite supremacySociologyLawSpanish Civil WarHistoryGender studiesReligious studiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt history
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Toni Morrison's Love, (1) in critiquing the American Civil Rights Movement, problematizes both American and African-American history and also uncovers the vexatious interrelationship of history and black identity, concern that has been in the novelist's foreground since the publication of her historical trilogy comprising Beloved, Jazz, and Paradise. (2) If, like the trilogy, Love reexamines critically the traumatic history of African-Americans, it also is stridently political in articulating certain harsh truths about the Civil Rights Love not only reformulates some of the crucial issues that impinge on African-American interests within American politics, but also departs significantly from the normative triumphalist discourses of the Civil Rights This essay, through analyzing the complex family history of the protagonist Cosey, seeks to frame Morrison's Love as critique of the American Civil Rights movement that had devastating on the successful pre-World War II black community. Set in the American Civil Rights era that corresponds with the period 1930-1990, Morrison's Love is about the complex legacy of Bill Cosey, successful Jim Crow-era black entrepreneur, and the loss of his personal paradise in the wake of integration. As the novel opens, the reader learns that their competing claims for Cosey's property and legacy turn Christine, the protagonist's granddaughter, and Heed, his second wife and childhood friend of Christine, into mortal enemies. Then, there is May, Cosey's daughter-in-law and Christine's mother, who seizes every opportunity to drive wedge between her daughter and Heed to sustain her supremacy. To some extent, this turbulent and warring world is redeemed by the stable presence of L, Cosey's cook and mediator, who, functioning as the narrator, ably illuminates the historical and social terrain of the novel. As the story unravels through the contrapuntal memory sequences and kaleidoscopic viewpoints of these characters, the novelist weaves and reweaves through the historical fabric, creating arresting vignettes of the intriguing legacies of slavery, racism, and the Civil Rights movement that attest to the temporality of history. Prior to developing critical approach to these specific issues, however, it be profitable to consider Morrison's observations on the Civil Rights era of the sixties, which forms the backdrop of Love: the legitimate and necessary drive for better jobs and housing, we abandoned the past and lot of the truth and sustenance that went with it. And when Civil Rights became Black Power, we frequently chose exoticism over reality. The old verities that made being black and alive in this country the most dynamic existence imaginable--so much of what satisfying, challenging and simply more interesting--were being driven underground--by blacks.... In trying to cure the cancer of slavery and its consequences, some healthy as well as malignant cells were destroyed. (3) Although this ambivalent stance is dramatized extensively in the novel Paradise, it is only with Love that Morrison probes the ideological fissures and fault lines of the Civil Rights movement more deeply. In an interview with Carolyn Denard, Morrison categorically states: I don't think this generation knows at all what going on in 1947 as far as Civil Rights are concerned. They think it all began in the 60s. It's interesting to me to re-examine that period--50s, 60s, and 70s era. (4) Likewise, in another interview with Jessica Jernigan, Morrison states that Love concerns the impact [of] the Civil-Rights movement ... on the people who lived through it, [and] how they dealt with the complex questions the civil-rights movement raised. She adds that the transition from segregation to integration was much more complicated, more deeply interesting than the popular history of the civil rights movement. (5) Thus, by invoking the Civil Rights era as backdrop to Love, Morrison not only shares its legacies with the present generation but also seeks to reexamine it in a new way so that her readers would not be left with the simple notion that there some agitation, some pain, and then, pow, everybody moved into whatever neighborhoods they wanted to and there more access into the corridors of power, there more money, you know, better jobs, etc. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,936
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,322
Écart entre enseignants0,310 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational fiction reviewMême sujetRace, History, and American SocietyTravaux en français237 207