Race, biochemical disease recurrence, and prostate–specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Whether black men are at increased risk for biochemical disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is debatable. Once black men have developed disease recurrence, it is unknown whether they have more aggressive disease than white men. To address this issue, the authors examined racial differences in pathologic features, time to disease recurrence, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) among a cohort of patients treated with RP. METHODS: The authors analyzed 953 white and 659 black men who were treated at 5 medical centers comprising the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) Database between 1988 and 2006. The association between race, adverse pathologic features, and biochemical disease recurrence was examined. Among those patients who developed disease recurrence, time to recurrence and PSADT were compared between the races. RESULTS: Black men were on average 2.1 years younger (P < .001) and had higher median preoperative PSA levels (7.6 ng/mL vs 7.0 ng/mL; P < .001), yet presented with a lower clinical stage of disease (T1: 62% vs 44%; P < .001) and similar biopsy Gleason scores (P = .59). After adjusting for multiple clinical characteristics, black men were found to be as likely as white men to have adverse pathologic features (Gleason score >or=7, positive surgical margins, and seminal vesicle invasion) in the RP specimen and were less likely to have extracapsular extension (P = .03). Black men were more likely to have a biochemical disease recurrence (hazards ratio [HR] of 1.28; 95% confidence interval [95% CI, 1.07-1.54 [P = .006]). This increased risk was reduced slightly after adjustment for multiple clinical and pathologic features, and no longer achieved statistical significance (HR of 1.19; 95% CI, 0.97-1.45 [P = .09]). Among men who developed disease recurrence, the median PSADT was found to be similar among black men (17.0 months) and white men (14.6 months) (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting with earlier clinical stage and similar pathologic features at RP, black men were found to be at a slightly increased risk for biochemical disease recurrence. However, these recurrences appear to be no more aggressive than those found in white men.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».