Race, biochemical disease recurrence, and prostate–specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether black men are at increased risk for biochemical disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is debatable. Once black men have developed disease recurrence, it is unknown whether they have more aggressive disease than white men. To address this issue, the authors examined racial differences in pathologic features, time to disease recurrence, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) among a cohort of patients treated with RP. METHODS: The authors analyzed 953 white and 659 black men who were treated at 5 medical centers comprising the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) Database between 1988 and 2006. The association between race, adverse pathologic features, and biochemical disease recurrence was examined. Among those patients who developed disease recurrence, time to recurrence and PSADT were compared between the races. RESULTS: Black men were on average 2.1 years younger (P < .001) and had higher median preoperative PSA levels (7.6 ng/mL vs 7.0 ng/mL; P < .001), yet presented with a lower clinical stage of disease (T1: 62% vs 44%; P < .001) and similar biopsy Gleason scores (P = .59). After adjusting for multiple clinical characteristics, black men were found to be as likely as white men to have adverse pathologic features (Gleason score >or=7, positive surgical margins, and seminal vesicle invasion) in the RP specimen and were less likely to have extracapsular extension (P = .03). Black men were more likely to have a biochemical disease recurrence (hazards ratio [HR] of 1.28; 95% confidence interval [95% CI, 1.07-1.54 [P = .006]). This increased risk was reduced slightly after adjustment for multiple clinical and pathologic features, and no longer achieved statistical significance (HR of 1.19; 95% CI, 0.97-1.45 [P = .09]). Among men who developed disease recurrence, the median PSADT was found to be similar among black men (17.0 months) and white men (14.6 months) (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting with earlier clinical stage and similar pathologic features at RP, black men were found to be at a slightly increased risk for biochemical disease recurrence. However, these recurrences appear to be no more aggressive than those found in white men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".