Zoonotic and Animal Vector Mediated Encephalitides
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
is responsible for encephalitis complications, without accompanying meningitis (Dionisio et al., 2001; Valassina et al., 2003). Rift Valley Fever VirusRift Valley Fever Virus (RVFV) is named from the region of Kenya from which it was first isolated (Daubney et al., 1931).A wide range of mosquito genera have been shown to maintain the enzoonic cycle (e.g., Aedes, Ochlerotatus, Stegomyia, Anopheles, Culex, Neomelaniconion, Eretmapodites), with Aedes vexans and Culex erraticus showing successful transmission to other animals to serve as bridge vectors (as reviewed by Pfeffer and Dobler (2010)).Infection in pregnant ruminants induces abortion at all stages of pregnancy to the magnitude that this event is referred to as an "abortion storm" (Kasari et al., 2008).Aborted fetuses, birthing material and body fluids of infected animals carry high viral loads and contact with these materials is a possible pathway for human infection (Pepin et al., 2010).Encephalitis was reported in outbreaks in Egypt and Saudi Arabia (Laughlin et al., 1979;Madani et al., 2003). Flaviviridae Family: Japanese Encephalitis Virus Serogroup, Tick Borne Encephalitis and Dengue Fever Encephalitis 2.3.1 Japanese Encephalitis Virus Serogroup: Japanese, St. Louis, and Australian Encephalitis Virus and West Nile VirusWith over 50,000 cases occurring each year, the Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) is responsible for the most cases of epidemic encephalitis worldwide (Weaver & Barrett, 2004).Pigs are suspected to be the main amplification host for the virus involving human infection due to their proximity to human habitation.Ardeid birds (e.g., herons and egrets) serve as the natural hosts.The mosquito vector, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, feeds on all hosts (birds, pigs and humans) and finds suitable habitat in the flooded rice paddies of Southeast Asia.Humans and horses are susceptible, but are considered dead end hosts (reviewed by Pfeffer and Dobler (2010)).The primary vectors for the St. Louis Encephalitis Virus (SLEV) are Cx.Pipiens and Cx.Quinquefasciatus, in the western U.S., Cx.Tarsalis, and Cx.Nigripalpus in Florida.Various birds serve as reservoirs (McLean et al., 1993;Georgiev, 2009).Outbreaks have been reported in almost every American state, along with Canada, and Central and South America (Calisher, 1994).Evidence suggests that SLEV was introduced into North America from South America and is locally circulated.Sequence comparisons from various strains show that the overall genome sequence is more conserved than other members of the Japanese serogroup (May et al., 2008).Basal diversification northward is estimated to have initiated around 177-247 years ago (Baillie et al., 2008).Vertical transmission of the St. Louis virus was studied by Flores et al. (2010).Vertical transmission is used as an overwinter mechanism for Culex quinquefasciatus in the temperate areas of Argentina, where St. Louis encephalitis is endemic.Lab studies confirmed that larva and adults both are capable of acquiring the virus.Australian Encephalitis can be caused by two viral agents, the Murray Valley Encephalitis Virus or Kunjin Virus, which are distributed in both Australia and Papua New Guinea.In Western Australia, the virus is monitored through the testing of serum from sentinel chickens (Hall et al., 1995).The virus is focused in the western part of the country, linked to the growth of the primary mosquito vector, Culex annulirostris.This habitat also supports How to referenceIn order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».