Transitional care for persons with dementia and their caregivers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Persons with dementia (PWD) experience many points of contact with health and community services, and must navigate through a health care system that has been criticized for poor integration. Although transitional care (the coordination of care as patients transfer between levels or locations of health care [1]) and health system navigation for PWD have been identified as policy and research priorities, there is a lack of research surrounding transitional care experiences of PWD. The primary objective of this study was to identify important aspects of transitional care from the perspectives of PWD and their caregivers. Secondary research questions addressed whether a) there is a perceived impact of dementia on care transitions in this population and b) important aspects of transitional care identified in existing transitional care models extend to PWD and their caregivers. Methods: The study employed a constructivist grounded theory approach. The semi-structured interview guide included general questions on care transitions, and specific questions informed by existing transitional care models. Interviews were conducted with PWD, caregivers or dyads in two regions of Ontario. Data analysis, which involved familiarization followed by initial and focused coding, was conducted alongside data collection in an iterative manner until theoretical saturation was reached. Member checks were conducted to ensure that the results remained true to participant views. Results and discussion: The domains of transitional care that were important to PWD and their caregivers included: PWD and caregiver proactivity, PWD and caregiver health care system knowledge, provider consistency, individualized care, support for caregiver needs, and social support. Participants valued similar aspects of transitional care as those identified in existing transitional care models, but there was a clear perceived influence of dementia on care transitions due to a heavy reliance on informal caregivers and an apparent lack of understanding of dementia in the health care system. The unique challenges associated with navigating the system with dementia shaped the way that the participants experienced common transitional care elements. Conclusions and lessons learned: Dementia is one of the most significant challenges facing the health care system, and a coordinated and integrated health system response is needed. The results of this study indicate a need for dementia-specific transitional care strategies. 15th International Conference on Integrated Care, Edinburgh, UK, March 25-27, 2015 1 International Journal of Integrated Care – Volume 15, 27 May – URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-117085– http://www.ijic.org/ Understanding transitional care from the perspective of PWD and their caregivers may inform better transitional care practice and policy, thus improving their quality of care and quality of life. Limitations: The study was conducted in locations within Ontario, Canada. Since the supports available for PWD moving through the health care system often differ by location, it is possible that the results may not be generalizable outside of the province. Suggestions for future research: We plan to conduct consultations with Alzheimer Society representatives and other stakeholders from across Canada to assess the generalizability of the results and to suggest strategies for improving the transition experiences of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The acceptability and effectiveness of these strategies can be investigated in future research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».