Transitional care for persons with dementia and their caregivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Persons with dementia (PWD) experience many points of contact with health and community services, and must navigate through a health care system that has been criticized for poor integration. Although transitional care (the coordination of care as patients transfer between levels or locations of health care [1]) and health system navigation for PWD have been identified as policy and research priorities, there is a lack of research surrounding transitional care experiences of PWD. The primary objective of this study was to identify important aspects of transitional care from the perspectives of PWD and their caregivers. Secondary research questions addressed whether a) there is a perceived impact of dementia on care transitions in this population and b) important aspects of transitional care identified in existing transitional care models extend to PWD and their caregivers. Methods: The study employed a constructivist grounded theory approach. The semi-structured interview guide included general questions on care transitions, and specific questions informed by existing transitional care models. Interviews were conducted with PWD, caregivers or dyads in two regions of Ontario. Data analysis, which involved familiarization followed by initial and focused coding, was conducted alongside data collection in an iterative manner until theoretical saturation was reached. Member checks were conducted to ensure that the results remained true to participant views. Results and discussion: The domains of transitional care that were important to PWD and their caregivers included: PWD and caregiver proactivity, PWD and caregiver health care system knowledge, provider consistency, individualized care, support for caregiver needs, and social support. Participants valued similar aspects of transitional care as those identified in existing transitional care models, but there was a clear perceived influence of dementia on care transitions due to a heavy reliance on informal caregivers and an apparent lack of understanding of dementia in the health care system. The unique challenges associated with navigating the system with dementia shaped the way that the participants experienced common transitional care elements. Conclusions and lessons learned: Dementia is one of the most significant challenges facing the health care system, and a coordinated and integrated health system response is needed. The results of this study indicate a need for dementia-specific transitional care strategies. 15th International Conference on Integrated Care, Edinburgh, UK, March 25-27, 2015 1 International Journal of Integrated Care – Volume 15, 27 May – URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-117085– http://www.ijic.org/ Understanding transitional care from the perspective of PWD and their caregivers may inform better transitional care practice and policy, thus improving their quality of care and quality of life. Limitations: The study was conducted in locations within Ontario, Canada. Since the supports available for PWD moving through the health care system often differ by location, it is possible that the results may not be generalizable outside of the province. Suggestions for future research: We plan to conduct consultations with Alzheimer Society representatives and other stakeholders from across Canada to assess the generalizability of the results and to suggest strategies for improving the transition experiences of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The acceptability and effectiveness of these strategies can be investigated in future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".