Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In retrospect the foundation of the Dictionary of Old English reads like the New World coming to the aid of the Old. Its founder, Angus Cameron, had the vision and the hope needed. His dissertation on a difficult Old English word had shown to him the insufficiency of Old English lexicography, no better really in the late 1960s than it had been a hundred years before. Neil Ker’s Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon had been published in 1957, and Angus for his thesis had rearranged its contents by turning it into a classified catalogue of texts for him to use as he hunted through the texts for his word in its many divergent senses. The standard dictionary at that time was effectively a work of the 1830s and earlier, supplemented by a good Mancunian scholar at the turn of the century. The work was mainly at second hand, relying on two good German lexicographers and on glossaries and translations of Anglo-Saxonists some good, others less so. Angus’s vision was that the basis was the textual evidence of the manuscripts and that a new age of technology had dawned, available in Canada, rich then, and led and encouraged by John Leyerle, of the States (resident as a professor in Toronto), a conference was organized to give substance to a hope. The assembled Anglo-Saxonists were united in spirit — rye, in my recollection — and it was determined that Toronto, with space provided in the Robarts Library by the University of Toronto, would be an excellent place for a new dictionary based on new technology, photocopies of manuscripts, so that all texts could be checked rather than merely used at second hand, and on the new electronic invention, the computer, at that early stage of its rapid development, especially good for concordances. A Canadian, Elaine Quanz, who had worked with Angus, was given the task of typing out all the texts of Old English, several thousands of them, for concording by the computer. If you wish to build high you need a firm foundation, and Angus saw to it that the foundation of the new dictionary was firm.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».