MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1607545059

ANTIČKI OBJEKTI U UVALI DOBRIKA NA OTOKU VELIKI BRIJUN

2007· article· sh· W1607545059 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anton Vitasović

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · 2007
Typearticle
Languesh
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAntiqueCovePeriod (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)GeographyArchaeologyAncient historyHistoryArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The power of argument deriving from the proportions of the antique villas in Dobrika Cove and the material finds recovered in the course of the research in the period between 1976 and 1984 changes the picture of antique Brijuni. The size, the content, and the luxury of the villa rustica built on three terraces in Verige Bay have been attracting the attention of guests and visitors for a hundred years. It was only in the second half of the last century that they acquired a silent companion, that is, the villa rustica in Dobrika cove, whose revival has brought to light the oldest Roman villa present on the islands of Brijuni. The material remains and social circumstances date the villa back to the period between the second half of the 2 nd century BC and the first quarter of the century BC, that is, to the period between 129 and 79 BC. Even though the facility has not been fully researched, the material remains and finds offer an insight not only into dating but also into the owners' various activities and needs. The life necessities of the people who occupied the villa were determined by the economic resources (fertile land, animals and the sea) which dictated the development of agriculture, live stock breeding and fishery. This antique enclave, which is relatively distant from any hill forts, lived until the time of the civil war between Anthony and Octavian, when it was destroyed. In the first half of the 1 st century AD, a big Roman villa, 51 meters x 58.7 meters in size, was built above, to the east and to the north of the abovementioned villa. The facilities are situated behind the three tracts of the peristyle that wind the courtyard, while the fourth, sea-oriented side, is closed by a colonnade. The colonnade connects to the western facade of the facility at the raised ground floor height. The above mentioned is sufficient for the reader to conclude that the western facade is formed, on both sides, by a raised ground floor building with a double-slope roof. The inside slopes of the roof construction, at the dripping edge level, are connected by a series of architraves posed on the pillars whose bases are situated at the bottom of the raised ground floor. Behind the western facade are rooms constituted by an elevation of the area reserved for machinery as well as the space above the cellar and the stable. The arrangement of the rooms indicates great respect for Vitruvius' advice - the cellar area is situated to the north, while the stables and the residential area are to the south; recommendations regarding the relations of the sizes, communication, and other recommendations were also implemented. All these elements were used in the construction of the central economic facility where the predominant position is assigned to the grape processing units, must fermentation facilities, and cellar areas. The presence of two facilities next to the central one, and of several other facilities, indicate that the estate was far more complex than was previously believed. Specifically, a smaller dislocated facility with a rather large residential area, a fireplace and a small bathroom, seems to have been the residence of wage labourers or slaves who, by all appearances, worked at the nearby quarry (fig. 7 2). The other facility (fig. 7 3 and fig. 9), situated in the immediate vicinity, is even more interesting, not so much for its size and finely worked architectural elements, but more for the presence of yet another grape processing unit.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,204
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,167
Écart entre enseignants0,160 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)Même sujetMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyTravaux en français237 207