MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1608824233

Working with Traumatized Youth in Child Welfare

2007· article· en· W1608824233 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
A Bremness

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChild Welfare and Adoption
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiopsychosocial modelWelfareSocial workPerspective (graphical)PsychologySocial WelfarePsychotherapistMedicineDevelopmental psychologyPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This interesting book is a look at traumatized children and youth in the child welfare system. This is an important issue as most traumatized children treated by child psychiatrists (as well as the severely traumatized), are likely captured under this scenario (have been, will be, or currently are in the care of Child Welfare). As a practitioner in this field (the regional Trauma/Attachment Program in Edmonton) I believe this book serves several purposes. Firstly, for child psychiatry, it gives a good overview of the problem from a social work perspective, something we can prosper from in our own sometimes conflicted dealings with the child welfare system. It helps to see that we all have a similar motive, even though the welfare and health systems appear to deflect problems onto each other. In our training as biopsychosocial physicians, this book adds a healthy dimension of the social aspect and thus a greater ability to integrate. Secondly, for all practitioners who treat or are responsible for these children, this book is an up-to-date review of the current biopsychosocial understanding and treatment of the problem. Part I (five chapters) covers impact of trauma to children, the effects of placement in care, trauma pathology and its neurosequential developmental impacts, assessing trauma, assessing medical and social factors that mediate resiliency and, how to identify and make use of these. Then in Part II (eight chapters), specific aspects of treatment are reviewed, including structured groups, individual play and expressive therapy, CBT, EMDR and Animal Assisted Therapy. Of note for child psychiatry is that no chapters are dedicated to the pharmacological approaches to these conditions. Part III (two chapters) deals with collaboration between child welfare and mental health. Although the authors are all USA based, I find the general principles equally relevant in Canada. The editor is Nancy Boyd Webb, a well respected author in this area. The other authors include Ph.D., M.S.W., Ed. D or DSW backgrounds covering the fields of child welfare, education, developmental psychology and trauma therapy in many forms. As well Chapter 3 is by Bruce Perry. M.D., who gives an excellent overview of “The Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics” (N.M.T.) (see www.childtrauma.org). This chapter is worth the book itself. The final chapter by Marilyn Benoit, M.D., past president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, gives an excellent overview of the collaboration on these children in the child welfare system from a mental health perspective. She emphasizes how important attachment is regarding the development of resiliency in trauma pathology and the associated conditions of ADHD, chronic anxiety, depression or other comorbidity. These chapters are “state of the art” and easily translated into clinical usefulness. One possible criticism of the book is that there is not enough attention given to the attachment disorders these children invariably have. Trauma and attachment pathologies are inter-twined. Many boundary issues arise in this population, and it has been my experience that not until basic trust in a dyadic attachment and a true sense of inner ‘safe place’ has been restored, can one expect to move through trauma healing with much success. Further, acute regression in these children often has as much to do with attachment pathology as with their trauma pathology. This in turn guides the strategies one might use in these critical moments. Overall this book was considerably helpful in understanding this population. It will be shared with staff, students, social workers, and foster parents. It allows one to see how collaboration amongst disciplines helps achieve the overall goal of a Trauma and Attachment Program - that of a “realistic and coherent life narrative” for the resolution of trauma and attachment in a way that allows for normal functioning and ongoing progressive development.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,224
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,981

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetChild Welfare and AdoptionTravaux en français237 207