MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1608824233

Working with Traumatized Youth in Child Welfare

2007· article· en· W1608824233 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A Bremness

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiopsychosocial modelWelfareSocial workPerspective (graphical)PsychologySocial WelfarePsychotherapistMedicineDevelopmental psychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This interesting book is a look at traumatized children and youth in the child welfare system. This is an important issue as most traumatized children treated by child psychiatrists (as well as the severely traumatized), are likely captured under this scenario (have been, will be, or currently are in the care of Child Welfare). As a practitioner in this field (the regional Trauma/Attachment Program in Edmonton) I believe this book serves several purposes. Firstly, for child psychiatry, it gives a good overview of the problem from a social work perspective, something we can prosper from in our own sometimes conflicted dealings with the child welfare system. It helps to see that we all have a similar motive, even though the welfare and health systems appear to deflect problems onto each other. In our training as biopsychosocial physicians, this book adds a healthy dimension of the social aspect and thus a greater ability to integrate. Secondly, for all practitioners who treat or are responsible for these children, this book is an up-to-date review of the current biopsychosocial understanding and treatment of the problem. Part I (five chapters) covers impact of trauma to children, the effects of placement in care, trauma pathology and its neurosequential developmental impacts, assessing trauma, assessing medical and social factors that mediate resiliency and, how to identify and make use of these. Then in Part II (eight chapters), specific aspects of treatment are reviewed, including structured groups, individual play and expressive therapy, CBT, EMDR and Animal Assisted Therapy. Of note for child psychiatry is that no chapters are dedicated to the pharmacological approaches to these conditions. Part III (two chapters) deals with collaboration between child welfare and mental health. Although the authors are all USA based, I find the general principles equally relevant in Canada. The editor is Nancy Boyd Webb, a well respected author in this area. The other authors include Ph.D., M.S.W., Ed. D or DSW backgrounds covering the fields of child welfare, education, developmental psychology and trauma therapy in many forms. As well Chapter 3 is by Bruce Perry. M.D., who gives an excellent overview of “The Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics” (N.M.T.) (see www.childtrauma.org). This chapter is worth the book itself. The final chapter by Marilyn Benoit, M.D., past president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, gives an excellent overview of the collaboration on these children in the child welfare system from a mental health perspective. She emphasizes how important attachment is regarding the development of resiliency in trauma pathology and the associated conditions of ADHD, chronic anxiety, depression or other comorbidity. These chapters are “state of the art” and easily translated into clinical usefulness. One possible criticism of the book is that there is not enough attention given to the attachment disorders these children invariably have. Trauma and attachment pathologies are inter-twined. Many boundary issues arise in this population, and it has been my experience that not until basic trust in a dyadic attachment and a true sense of inner ‘safe place’ has been restored, can one expect to move through trauma healing with much success. Further, acute regression in these children often has as much to do with attachment pathology as with their trauma pathology. This in turn guides the strategies one might use in these critical moments. Overall this book was considerably helpful in understanding this population. It will be shared with staff, students, social workers, and foster parents. It allows one to see how collaboration amongst disciplines helps achieve the overall goal of a Trauma and Attachment Program - that of a “realistic and coherent life narrative” for the resolution of trauma and attachment in a way that allows for normal functioning and ongoing progressive development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207