MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W16205522 · doi:10.1080/20436564.2002.12219825

The Erosion of Geography

2002· article· en· W16205522 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeography · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGeography Education and Pedagogy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGovernment (linguistics)Subject (documents)CurriculumNational curriculumCitizenshipPolitical scienceLawPoliticsLibrary science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IN ITS WHITE paper on education earlier this year, the government mentioned mathematics more than 50 times, history rated one mention and geography none at all. Currently geography is a part of the core curriculum until the age of 14 and then it becomes optional, but in the education bill, due to be published on Friday [23] November, the subject is expected to lose out again. Because the government wants to introduce new themes such as citizenship, pupils will be able to drop geography after the age of 1 1 a potential disaster for the subject and, many would argue, a step backwards for education. According to the government, the point of education is to develop our critical faculties. This has always been a key test applied to the national curriculum and whether it succeeds in its aim of making us discerning citizens. But the government seems to have lost sight of its own objectives. With the emphasis on core subjects, the one that is most help in getting to grips with the important issues of the day geography is being squeezed. So much so that geographers everywhere are alarmed that this vital discipline is under attack, not as a deliberate policy but by default, because the government's priorities are elsewhere. One of these is Andy Leeder, deputy head of Copleston School, Ipswich. Although dropping geography is an option at all other schools it remains compulsory at Copleston. This is because the school still has the right to decide what suits the best needs of its pupils. Leeder says economic and industrial understanding and political and environmental awareness are part of the knowledge and values pupils are supposed to develop. 'The aspiration is to make them more rounded citizens. They must understand such things as sustainability. There is no better subject to do this than geography' Not surprisingly, with this kind of support the school has a thriving geography department, which has no trouble recruiting excellent teachers. Five of Copleston 's teachers work regularly for exam boards, something encouraged by the school. The pupils have above-average pass rates and the parents are keen 'because they like success,' he says. Leeder attended a meeting at the Royal Geographical Society in October 2001 to discuss 'Geography: an education for life'. There was an underlying tone of anxiety about the proceedings. There is a gradual slipping away of the numbers of pupils taking geography at GCSE level, from a high of 302,298 in 1996 to 253,756 in 2001. The number of students going on to take the subject at Aand ASlevel has shrunk in proportion. Despite the drop in numbers, high standards are being maintained. The number of passes in the A-C range is above average: students who do opt for geography are clearly keen. Universities are largely unaffected so far, with courses in teaching and research in 90 departments, but they are already feeling threatened. A and B grades at A-level are still required entrance grades, which is much tougher than for many subjects such as science and engineering. What geography seems to lack, unlike media and film studies, is street cred with potential undergraduates. But unlike these two areas, which are over-subscribed with people seeking a glamorous life, geography seems more likely to deliver both a job and excitement. In an average year The Guardian, and the paper cannot be alone, is besieged with unemployed media graduates, many of whom seem to want to become environment correspondents. But mos seem to have only a scant knowledge of ge graphy, which would be a much better starting point. Geography and environment often seem interchangeable, although geography can be a wider subject. It is no coincidence that environment correspondents of national newspapers cover the nnual geographers conference. The range of subjects is staggering, from the ehabili ation of high-rise blocks of flats for modern living, limpets undermining the White Cliffs of Dover, and the behaviour of male nudists Canadian beaches, to the settlement of retired Brit sh people in Spain and Italy and how happy they are as a result. There are some more traditional areas, such as the disappearance of the world's glaciers and other investigations of the physical features. Some people try to split geography into physical and human geography, but the two are intertwined.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,539
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,303
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGeographyMême sujetGeography Education and PedagogyTravaux en français237 207