MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Erosion of Geography

2002· article· en· W16205522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGeography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeography Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Subject (documents)CurriculumNational curriculumCitizenshipPolitical scienceLawPoliticsLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN ITS WHITE paper on education earlier this year, the government mentioned mathematics more than 50 times, history rated one mention and geography none at all. Currently geography is a part of the core curriculum until the age of 14 and then it becomes optional, but in the education bill, due to be published on Friday [23] November, the subject is expected to lose out again. Because the government wants to introduce new themes such as citizenship, pupils will be able to drop geography after the age of 1 1 a potential disaster for the subject and, many would argue, a step backwards for education. According to the government, the point of education is to develop our critical faculties. This has always been a key test applied to the national curriculum and whether it succeeds in its aim of making us discerning citizens. But the government seems to have lost sight of its own objectives. With the emphasis on core subjects, the one that is most help in getting to grips with the important issues of the day geography is being squeezed. So much so that geographers everywhere are alarmed that this vital discipline is under attack, not as a deliberate policy but by default, because the government's priorities are elsewhere. One of these is Andy Leeder, deputy head of Copleston School, Ipswich. Although dropping geography is an option at all other schools it remains compulsory at Copleston. This is because the school still has the right to decide what suits the best needs of its pupils. Leeder says economic and industrial understanding and political and environmental awareness are part of the knowledge and values pupils are supposed to develop. 'The aspiration is to make them more rounded citizens. They must understand such things as sustainability. There is no better subject to do this than geography' Not surprisingly, with this kind of support the school has a thriving geography department, which has no trouble recruiting excellent teachers. Five of Copleston 's teachers work regularly for exam boards, something encouraged by the school. The pupils have above-average pass rates and the parents are keen 'because they like success,' he says. Leeder attended a meeting at the Royal Geographical Society in October 2001 to discuss 'Geography: an education for life'. There was an underlying tone of anxiety about the proceedings. There is a gradual slipping away of the numbers of pupils taking geography at GCSE level, from a high of 302,298 in 1996 to 253,756 in 2001. The number of students going on to take the subject at Aand ASlevel has shrunk in proportion. Despite the drop in numbers, high standards are being maintained. The number of passes in the A-C range is above average: students who do opt for geography are clearly keen. Universities are largely unaffected so far, with courses in teaching and research in 90 departments, but they are already feeling threatened. A and B grades at A-level are still required entrance grades, which is much tougher than for many subjects such as science and engineering. What geography seems to lack, unlike media and film studies, is street cred with potential undergraduates. But unlike these two areas, which are over-subscribed with people seeking a glamorous life, geography seems more likely to deliver both a job and excitement. In an average year The Guardian, and the paper cannot be alone, is besieged with unemployed media graduates, many of whom seem to want to become environment correspondents. But mos seem to have only a scant knowledge of ge graphy, which would be a much better starting point. Geography and environment often seem interchangeable, although geography can be a wider subject. It is no coincidence that environment correspondents of national newspapers cover the nnual geographers conference. The range of subjects is staggering, from the ehabili ation of high-rise blocks of flats for modern living, limpets undermining the White Cliffs of Dover, and the behaviour of male nudists Canadian beaches, to the settlement of retired Brit sh people in Spain and Italy and how happy they are as a result. There are some more traditional areas, such as the disappearance of the world's glaciers and other investigations of the physical features. Some people try to split geography into physical and human geography, but the two are intertwined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeographySame topicGeography Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207