Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Indian health officials have begun a well-publicized campaign to register all medical centres in the country that offer prenatal sex-determination services through ultrasonography, amniocentesis, chorionic villi biopsy and other techniques. The move follows a directive from the Supreme Court of India to submit a report on the question. A 1994 law prohibits Indian doctors from carrying out sex-determination tests if female fetuses will be aborted as a result. However, centuries of tradition demand that every couple produce at least one male child, and even today most couples would go to any extent to do that. Although the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act of 1994 has remained on the statute books, the government has no idea how many medical centres actually offer sex-determination services. As a result, female fetuses are still being aborted in every part of the country. “I know a couple of obstetricians in Bombay's suburbs who perform sex determinations for 10 to 15 women every day,” says Dr. Anirudh Malpani, one of the India's leading specialists in assisted reproduction techniques. “The gender balance is badly skewed in some north Indian states like Punjab and Haryana,” adds Dr. Vimla Nadkarni, secretary general of the Family Planning Association of India. Even in a progressive state like Maharashtra, of which Bombay is the capital, the sex ratio is 922 women for every 1000 men, she adds. Angered by government apathy at both national and state levels and alarmed by the growing distortion in sex ratios, the Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) first approached the courts a few years ago. Their public-interest litigation has now reached the Supreme Court, which has asked health ministries in 11 states what action they have taken thus far. The Supreme Court has also directed the leading manufacturers of ultrasound equipment to supply the names and addresses of medical centres that have purchased their equipment in the past 5 years. The result could be thousands of addresses because the advent of portable ultrasonography has enabled most gynecologists to conduct ultrasound examinations in their offices. “In Bombay alone there would be 1200 to 2000 medical centres where this sort of thing takes place,” says Sumita Menon, an activist with CEHAT. For sex determination, ultrasonography is the obvious method of choice for Indian couples because it is simple and risk free. Other methods, such as amniocentesis, are more difficult, while chorionic villi biopsy requires sophisticated and expensive equipment that many physicians cannot afford. After the sex of the fetus has been determined, the next step is to abort the female fetus at the request of the expectant mother. “What the legal action has achieved is to drive the whole thing underground,” says Dr. P. N. Rao, a gynecologist in an up-market Bombay suburb. — Dr. Sumit Ghoshal, Bombay
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,013 | 0,017 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,089 | 0,034 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».