Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indian health officials have begun a well-publicized campaign to register all medical centres in the country that offer prenatal sex-determination services through ultrasonography, amniocentesis, chorionic villi biopsy and other techniques. The move follows a directive from the Supreme Court of India to submit a report on the question. A 1994 law prohibits Indian doctors from carrying out sex-determination tests if female fetuses will be aborted as a result. However, centuries of tradition demand that every couple produce at least one male child, and even today most couples would go to any extent to do that. Although the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act of 1994 has remained on the statute books, the government has no idea how many medical centres actually offer sex-determination services. As a result, female fetuses are still being aborted in every part of the country. “I know a couple of obstetricians in Bombay's suburbs who perform sex determinations for 10 to 15 women every day,” says Dr. Anirudh Malpani, one of the India's leading specialists in assisted reproduction techniques. “The gender balance is badly skewed in some north Indian states like Punjab and Haryana,” adds Dr. Vimla Nadkarni, secretary general of the Family Planning Association of India. Even in a progressive state like Maharashtra, of which Bombay is the capital, the sex ratio is 922 women for every 1000 men, she adds. Angered by government apathy at both national and state levels and alarmed by the growing distortion in sex ratios, the Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) first approached the courts a few years ago. Their public-interest litigation has now reached the Supreme Court, which has asked health ministries in 11 states what action they have taken thus far. The Supreme Court has also directed the leading manufacturers of ultrasound equipment to supply the names and addresses of medical centres that have purchased their equipment in the past 5 years. The result could be thousands of addresses because the advent of portable ultrasonography has enabled most gynecologists to conduct ultrasound examinations in their offices. “In Bombay alone there would be 1200 to 2000 medical centres where this sort of thing takes place,” says Sumita Menon, an activist with CEHAT. For sex determination, ultrasonography is the obvious method of choice for Indian couples because it is simple and risk free. Other methods, such as amniocentesis, are more difficult, while chorionic villi biopsy requires sophisticated and expensive equipment that many physicians cannot afford. After the sex of the fetus has been determined, the next step is to abort the female fetus at the request of the expectant mother. “What the legal action has achieved is to drive the whole thing underground,” says Dr. P. N. Rao, a gynecologist in an up-market Bombay suburb. — Dr. Sumit Ghoshal, Bombay
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.089 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".