46 EFFICIENT TRANSFECTION OF PLASMID DNA INTO CELLS FOR USE AS NUCLEAR DONORS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has the potential to significantly improve the production of valuable livestock that produce recombinant proteins, such as pharmaceutical proteins for human disease or biomaterials for medical use. The success of this potential depends on efficient and optimized protocols for introducing exogenous DNA into cells. In this study, we compared two methods of transfection, Effectene (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and electroporation. Plasmid DNA (pEGFF-N1, Clontech, Seoul, Korea) was transfected into fetal fibroblasts (FFB), cumulus cells (CUC), and adult ear skin cells (ESC). Transfection efficiency, chromosome normality, gene expression, and apoptosis were assessed. Cells cultured in a-modified Eagle's medium (a-MEM; BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA) + 10% FBS were transfected with pEGFP-N1. For electroporation, cells (5 × 106 cells/mL) were mixed in 300 µL perrim buffer (75% Cytosalts with 120 mM KCl, 0.15 mM CaCl2, 10 mM K2HPO4, 5 mM MgCl2, and 25% a-MEM) + 15 µg pEGFP-N1, and subjected to two pulses of 0.38 kV and 400 µF delivered by Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad; BMS, Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). For Effectene transfection, the procedure suggested by the manufacture was followed. Transfected cells were selected with 600 µg/mL G418 (Gibco; KDR Biotech Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea) and cultured at 39°C, 5% CO2 in air. Assessments of EGFP transfected cells by green fluorescence was carried out under an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Nicon, Kanagawa, Japan) equipped with a filter for FITC (excitation maximum = 488 nm; emission maximum = 507 nm). Differences among the groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA after arc-sine transformation of proportional data. Most cells (>80%) in confluence were at G0/G1 phase, and transfection of the gene into all three cell types did not affect the incidence of chromosomal abnormality or change morphology. In addition, the rates of apoptosis assessed by TUNEL did not differ in all three cell types by either method of transfection at different cell passages. However, the efficiency of gene transfection into FFB by Effectene reagent (14.2 ± 1.7%) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that by electroporation (5.1 ± 1.0%). Among the three type cells, the efficiency of gene transfection by Effectene and electroporation of FFB (14.2 ± 1.7 and 5.1 ± 1.0%, respectively) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of CUC and ESC (9.4 ± 1.5 and 3.3 ± 0.8; 8.8 ± 0.7 and 2.1 ± 0.4%, respectively). In conclusion, although there were no differences in the alteration of chromosomes, cell morphology, and apoptosis among three cell types transfected with or without plasmid DNA, FFB is the most effective cell type to be transfected. Effectene is superior to other currently available methods for introducing plasmid DNA into a variety of cells. The high level of transfection achieved by Effectene will encourage its use as a tool for producing transgenic embryos and animals by SCNT. This work was supported by High Technology Development Project for Agriculture and Forestry Korea, MAF-SGRP, 300012-05-3-SB010.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».