Bosutinib As Third-Line Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP CML) Following Failure with Imatinib Plus Dasatinib and/or Nilotinib: 48-Month Update of a Phase 1/2 Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Bosutinib (BOS) is an oral dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This long-term update of an ongoing open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BOS as 3rd-line therapy in CP CML pts after prior TKI failure. Pts (n=119) were aged ≥18 y with prior imatinib (IM) failure plus dasatinib (D) resistance (D-R; n=38) or intolerance (D-I; n=50), nilotinib (N) resistance (N-R; n=26), or N-I or D-R/I + N-R/I (n=5) and received BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Median (range) age was 56 (20-79) y; time from CML diagnosis was 6.6 (0.6–18.3) y; follow-up duration was 31.1 (0.3–89.1) mo; and BOS treatment duration was 8.6 (0.2–87.7) mo. Escalation to BOS 600 mg/d occurred in 22 (19%) pts. For the last enrolled pt, time from first dose was ≥48 mo (24% still receiving BOS at 4 y). Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was newly attained or maintained from baseline by 33% and 7% of pts, respectively (32% attained/maintained complete cytogenetic response [CCyR]) (Table). Kaplan-Meier probability of maintaining MCyR or CCyR at 4 y was 69% and 54%, respectively. At baseline, 95 pts had known mutation status. Twenty unique BCR-ABL mutations occurred in 39 (41%) pts, including 11 with >1 mutation; common mutations were F317L (n=8), T315I (n=7), G250E, and Y253H (n=6 each). MCyR rate was similar in pts without mutations (37%) and pts with 1 mutation (38%); 27% of pts with >1 mutation and 14% of pts with T315I had MCyR. Of 57 pts assessed for mutations at end of treatment, 13 had new mutations (V299L, n=6; T315I, n=3; G250E, n=2 [1 pt also had a new V299L mutation]; F359C, L248V, and L273M, n=1 each; 10 pts had prior mutation); 11/13 pts with new mutations discontinued BOS due to progressive disease (PD) or lack of efficacy. Cumulative incidence of on-treatment PD (ie, transformation to accelerated-/blast-phase [AP/BP] CML, increasing white blood cell count, loss of confirmed complete hematologic response or unconfirmed MCyR) or death* at 4 y was 24%; 52% of pts discontinued before 4 y without an event. Overall survival (OS) at 2 y was 84% (Table; pts followed for OS for only 2 y after BOS discontinuation]). Cumulative incidence of on-treatment transformation* at 4 y was 4%; 71% discontinued before 4 y without transformation. No pt transformed to BP. There was limited follow-up of patients after treatment discontinuation. Overall, 90 (76%) pts discontinued treatment within 4 y, most commonly due to adverse event (AE; n=28 [24%]) as primary reason for treatment discontinuation. Twenty-six (22%) deaths occurred on study, 5 within 30 d of last BOS dose. Most deaths were due to disease progression (n=12) or AE (n=11; 1 related to BOS); 3 had unknown cause. Non-hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) commonly included (all grades; grade 3/4) diarrhea (83%; 9%), nausea (48%; 1%), and vomiting (38%; 1%); hematologic toxicities included thrombocytopenia (39%; 26%), neutropenia (21%; 16%), and anemia (20%; 7%). Cardiac events (MedDRA system organ classification of cardiac disorders) occurred in 18% of pts (8% grade 3/4). Overall incidence of newly occurring TEAEs for pts on treatment during specific years was 99% in year 1 (y1; n=118/119), 74% in y2 (n=37/50), 64% in y3 (n=25/39), and 72% in y4 (n=23/32). The most common TEAEs were diarrhea in y1 (n=98), pleural effusion in y2 (n=6), abdominal pain in y3 (n=5), and pleural effusion in y4 (n=5). TEAEs were managed primarily by dose delays (66%) and dose reductions (50%). Discontinuations due to AEs were most common in y1 (19% [n=23/119]); 2, 2, and 3 pts discontinued due to AEs in y2, y3, and y4, respectively. The most common reason for discontinuation due to AE was thrombocytopenia (6%). After ≥48 mo follow-up, third-line BOS therapy shows efficacy and manageable toxicity in CP CML pts. Table 1IM + D-R (n=38)IM + D-I (n=50)IM + N-R (n=26)IM + N-I orD-R/I+ N-R/I (n=5)Total (n=119)Evaluable,a n3645265112MCyR, n (%)14 (39)19 (42)10 (39)2 (40)45 (40)CCyR , n (%)8 (22)18 (40)8 (31)2 (40)36 (32)Probability of maintaining MCyR at 4 yb43%87%78%NR69%Probability of maintaining CCyR at 4 yb17%66%63%NR54%Treated, n3850265119PD/death at 4 yc24%16%35%NR24%OS at 2 yb80%83%92%NR84% NR=not reported (small sample size). aReceived ≥1 BOS dose and had a valid baseline efficacy assessment for the respective endpoint. bBased on KM estimates. cBased on cumulative incidence, *adjusting for competing risk of treatment discontinuation without event. Disclosures Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Lipton:Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schafhausen:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria. Matczak:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Leip:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Noonan:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Brümmendorf:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors: Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors Patents & Royalties. Cortes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».