Bosutinib As Third-Line Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP CML) Following Failure with Imatinib Plus Dasatinib and/or Nilotinib: 48-Month Update of a Phase 1/2 Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bosutinib (BOS) is an oral dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This long-term update of an ongoing open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BOS as 3rd-line therapy in CP CML pts after prior TKI failure. Pts (n=119) were aged ≥18 y with prior imatinib (IM) failure plus dasatinib (D) resistance (D-R; n=38) or intolerance (D-I; n=50), nilotinib (N) resistance (N-R; n=26), or N-I or D-R/I + N-R/I (n=5) and received BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Median (range) age was 56 (20-79) y; time from CML diagnosis was 6.6 (0.6–18.3) y; follow-up duration was 31.1 (0.3–89.1) mo; and BOS treatment duration was 8.6 (0.2–87.7) mo. Escalation to BOS 600 mg/d occurred in 22 (19%) pts. For the last enrolled pt, time from first dose was ≥48 mo (24% still receiving BOS at 4 y). Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was newly attained or maintained from baseline by 33% and 7% of pts, respectively (32% attained/maintained complete cytogenetic response [CCyR]) (Table). Kaplan-Meier probability of maintaining MCyR or CCyR at 4 y was 69% and 54%, respectively. At baseline, 95 pts had known mutation status. Twenty unique BCR-ABL mutations occurred in 39 (41%) pts, including 11 with >1 mutation; common mutations were F317L (n=8), T315I (n=7), G250E, and Y253H (n=6 each). MCyR rate was similar in pts without mutations (37%) and pts with 1 mutation (38%); 27% of pts with >1 mutation and 14% of pts with T315I had MCyR. Of 57 pts assessed for mutations at end of treatment, 13 had new mutations (V299L, n=6; T315I, n=3; G250E, n=2 [1 pt also had a new V299L mutation]; F359C, L248V, and L273M, n=1 each; 10 pts had prior mutation); 11/13 pts with new mutations discontinued BOS due to progressive disease (PD) or lack of efficacy. Cumulative incidence of on-treatment PD (ie, transformation to accelerated-/blast-phase [AP/BP] CML, increasing white blood cell count, loss of confirmed complete hematologic response or unconfirmed MCyR) or death* at 4 y was 24%; 52% of pts discontinued before 4 y without an event. Overall survival (OS) at 2 y was 84% (Table; pts followed for OS for only 2 y after BOS discontinuation]). Cumulative incidence of on-treatment transformation* at 4 y was 4%; 71% discontinued before 4 y without transformation. No pt transformed to BP. There was limited follow-up of patients after treatment discontinuation. Overall, 90 (76%) pts discontinued treatment within 4 y, most commonly due to adverse event (AE; n=28 [24%]) as primary reason for treatment discontinuation. Twenty-six (22%) deaths occurred on study, 5 within 30 d of last BOS dose. Most deaths were due to disease progression (n=12) or AE (n=11; 1 related to BOS); 3 had unknown cause. Non-hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) commonly included (all grades; grade 3/4) diarrhea (83%; 9%), nausea (48%; 1%), and vomiting (38%; 1%); hematologic toxicities included thrombocytopenia (39%; 26%), neutropenia (21%; 16%), and anemia (20%; 7%). Cardiac events (MedDRA system organ classification of cardiac disorders) occurred in 18% of pts (8% grade 3/4). Overall incidence of newly occurring TEAEs for pts on treatment during specific years was 99% in year 1 (y1; n=118/119), 74% in y2 (n=37/50), 64% in y3 (n=25/39), and 72% in y4 (n=23/32). The most common TEAEs were diarrhea in y1 (n=98), pleural effusion in y2 (n=6), abdominal pain in y3 (n=5), and pleural effusion in y4 (n=5). TEAEs were managed primarily by dose delays (66%) and dose reductions (50%). Discontinuations due to AEs were most common in y1 (19% [n=23/119]); 2, 2, and 3 pts discontinued due to AEs in y2, y3, and y4, respectively. The most common reason for discontinuation due to AE was thrombocytopenia (6%). After ≥48 mo follow-up, third-line BOS therapy shows efficacy and manageable toxicity in CP CML pts. Table 1IM + D-R (n=38)IM + D-I (n=50)IM + N-R (n=26)IM + N-I orD-R/I+ N-R/I (n=5)Total (n=119)Evaluable,a n3645265112MCyR, n (%)14 (39)19 (42)10 (39)2 (40)45 (40)CCyR , n (%)8 (22)18 (40)8 (31)2 (40)36 (32)Probability of maintaining MCyR at 4 yb43%87%78%NR69%Probability of maintaining CCyR at 4 yb17%66%63%NR54%Treated, n3850265119PD/death at 4 yc24%16%35%NR24%OS at 2 yb80%83%92%NR84% NR=not reported (small sample size). aReceived ≥1 BOS dose and had a valid baseline efficacy assessment for the respective endpoint. bBased on KM estimates. cBased on cumulative incidence, *adjusting for competing risk of treatment discontinuation without event. Disclosures Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Lipton:Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schafhausen:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria. Matczak:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Leip:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Noonan:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Brümmendorf:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors: Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination inhibitors Patents & Royalties. Cortes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".