MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W170591962 · doi:10.1155/2000/296481

What if a Child has Never been Immunized?

2000· article· en· W170591962 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Ben Tan, Lorna G. Nolan

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Établissements canadiensRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Children in Canada are routinely immunized against nine infectious diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) infection, measles, mumps, rubella and hepatitis B. Vaccines for these diseases are administered following immunization schedules that vary slightly between provinces and territories (1). A varicella vaccine was licensed in Canada in December 1998 (2), but is not yet routinely used in most provincial or territorial childhood programs (Prince Edward Island is initiating a childhood varicella immunization program in 2000). Despite high overall vaccine coverage (estimated at 82% to 95% for individual vaccine antigens when assessed at 24 months of age [3]), there remain individuals or pockets of children in Canada who are susceptible to infection because they have never been or are incompletely immunized against one or more of these nine infectious diseases. New immigrants from countries who have not had one or more of the above-mentioned childhood vaccines make up part of this never-immunized group, especially if ‘catch-up’ immunizations are not provided after their arrival in Canada (4). Some children are not immunized because they have valid medical contraindications (5), they missed immunization appointments or their parents declined to have the children immunized. Some parents have religious reasons for declining the immunizations, while others hold mistaken beliefs that the infectious diseases either do not cause serious harm or no longer occur in Canada (6). Infectious diseases that are rare in Canada, such as diphtheria and poliomyelitis, may be reintroduced into the country from abroad. Cases of measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis, tetanus, Hib and hepatitis B are still reported in Canada. Examples include the recent outbreaks of rubella in Manitoba (7) and mumps in British Columbia (8). Because the immunization coverage in Canadian children is generally high, physicians may wrongly assume that children are fully immunized by the time that they enter school. Children’s immunization records should be checked to ensure that the children’s immunization are up-to-date whenever they are exposed to vaccine-preventable infections. Table 1 (middle column) outlines the preventive steps that physicians and public health authorities recommend when faced with a susceptible child who has been exposed to one of these infections. This often involves one or a combination of the following steps: using immune globulin preparations to provide immediate protection; starting the primary immunization series to provide either immediate (eg, postexposure immunization for measles, varicella and hepatitis A) or future protection; prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis; and excluding the child from school or daycare to prevent further exposure or spread of the infection. For fully immunized children, these steps may be eliminated (see Table 1, right-hand column for comparison). Parents should be encouraged to inform their physicians when their unimmunized child is exposed to a vaccinepreventable illness so that the appropriate steps can be taken during a bona fide exposure. Unbeknownst to the parents, a susceptible child may be exposed to infectious persons who are asymptomatic or the child may sustain a wound that becomes contaminated with Clostridium tetani and tetanus may develop without an opportunity to provide preventive measures. Parents of unimmunized children are often unaware that a blood product (immune globulin) may be administered in the absence of prior immunity to certain infections. A ‘catchup’ primary immunization series that is initiated only after exposure has occurred will not usually induce immunity in time to prevent or reduce the severity of the infection (with the exception of measles, varicella and hepatitis A, where postexposure immunization is effective in preventing illness). Therefore, avoiding the primary series during infancy simply delays the immunization until after an infectious exposure has occurred. Adults who were not immunized during childhood may travel abroad and be exposed to these vaccine-preventable infectious diseases in foreign countries. In developing countries, health care may not be readily available, thereby increasing the risk of morbidity or mortality from these infectious diseases. Furthermore, colleges offering medical, veterinary, dental, nursing and laboratory technology degrees require students to

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,684
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,636

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology→Même sujetVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→Travaux en français237 207→