MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W170591962 · doi:10.1155/2000/296481

What if a Child has Never been Immunized?

2000· article· en· W170591962 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ben Tan, Lorna G. Nolan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children in Canada are routinely immunized against nine infectious diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) infection, measles, mumps, rubella and hepatitis B. Vaccines for these diseases are administered following immunization schedules that vary slightly between provinces and territories (1). A varicella vaccine was licensed in Canada in December 1998 (2), but is not yet routinely used in most provincial or territorial childhood programs (Prince Edward Island is initiating a childhood varicella immunization program in 2000). Despite high overall vaccine coverage (estimated at 82% to 95% for individual vaccine antigens when assessed at 24 months of age [3]), there remain individuals or pockets of children in Canada who are susceptible to infection because they have never been or are incompletely immunized against one or more of these nine infectious diseases. New immigrants from countries who have not had one or more of the above-mentioned childhood vaccines make up part of this never-immunized group, especially if ‘catch-up’ immunizations are not provided after their arrival in Canada (4). Some children are not immunized because they have valid medical contraindications (5), they missed immunization appointments or their parents declined to have the children immunized. Some parents have religious reasons for declining the immunizations, while others hold mistaken beliefs that the infectious diseases either do not cause serious harm or no longer occur in Canada (6). Infectious diseases that are rare in Canada, such as diphtheria and poliomyelitis, may be reintroduced into the country from abroad. Cases of measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis, tetanus, Hib and hepatitis B are still reported in Canada. Examples include the recent outbreaks of rubella in Manitoba (7) and mumps in British Columbia (8). Because the immunization coverage in Canadian children is generally high, physicians may wrongly assume that children are fully immunized by the time that they enter school. Children’s immunization records should be checked to ensure that the children’s immunization are up-to-date whenever they are exposed to vaccine-preventable infections. Table 1 (middle column) outlines the preventive steps that physicians and public health authorities recommend when faced with a susceptible child who has been exposed to one of these infections. This often involves one or a combination of the following steps: using immune globulin preparations to provide immediate protection; starting the primary immunization series to provide either immediate (eg, postexposure immunization for measles, varicella and hepatitis A) or future protection; prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis; and excluding the child from school or daycare to prevent further exposure or spread of the infection. For fully immunized children, these steps may be eliminated (see Table 1, right-hand column for comparison). Parents should be encouraged to inform their physicians when their unimmunized child is exposed to a vaccinepreventable illness so that the appropriate steps can be taken during a bona fide exposure. Unbeknownst to the parents, a susceptible child may be exposed to infectious persons who are asymptomatic or the child may sustain a wound that becomes contaminated with Clostridium tetani and tetanus may develop without an opportunity to provide preventive measures. Parents of unimmunized children are often unaware that a blood product (immune globulin) may be administered in the absence of prior immunity to certain infections. A ‘catchup’ primary immunization series that is initiated only after exposure has occurred will not usually induce immunity in time to prevent or reduce the severity of the infection (with the exception of measles, varicella and hepatitis A, where postexposure immunization is effective in preventing illness). Therefore, avoiding the primary series during infancy simply delays the immunization until after an infectious exposure has occurred. Adults who were not immunized during childhood may travel abroad and be exposed to these vaccine-preventable infectious diseases in foreign countries. In developing countries, health care may not be readily available, thereby increasing the risk of morbidity or mortality from these infectious diseases. Furthermore, colleges offering medical, veterinary, dental, nursing and laboratory technology degrees require students to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology→Same topicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→French-language works237,207→