Prevalence and impact of preoperative moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation on patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a marker for late-stage myocardial and valvular heart disease. Whether preoperative TR affects clinical outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has never been investigated. This study sought to identify the impact of moderate and severe TR on outcomes after TAVR. METHODS: All patients undergoing TAVR from January 2007 to August 2012 at St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, (n = 518) were dichotomized according to the severity of preoperative TR (moderate/severe vs. none/mild). All clinical outcomes were defined according to the valve academic research consortium-2 definitions. RESULTS: At baseline, moderate or severe TR was reported in 79 patients (15.2%). At 30 days, moderate/severe TR had improved in 12 patients (15.2%), was unchanged in 46 patients (58.3%), and worsened in 7 patients (8.9%). Of those with none/mild TR at baseline, 35 (7.9%) patients had moderate TR at 30-day follow-up. Two-year all-cause (38.4% vs. 20.0%, Log-rank test, P = 0.001) and cardiac mortality (12.9% vs. 4.6%, Log-rank test, P = 0.004) as estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis were considerably higher in patients with significant TR. However, significant TR did not emerge as independent risk factor for 2-year all-cause mortality (adjusted OR: 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.64, P = 0.105). Pre-specified subgroups showed an interaction between TR and left ventricular systolic function (Pinteraction = 0.047). Indeed, moderate/severe TR was significantly related to mortality only in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40% (adjusted OR: 2.01, CI: 1.05-3.84, P = 0.036). In patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, TR had no significant impact on all-cause mortality (adjusted OR: 1.04, CI: 0.34-3.16, P = 0.946). No significant interactions were identified regarding patients with perioperative moderate/severe mitral regurgitation (Pinteraction = 0.829) and patients with baseline systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 60 mm Hg (Pinteraction = 0.669). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TAVR, significant preoperative TR was present in 15% of patients and associated with more comorbidities. Despite being associated with a doubling of mortality rate, after a robust adjustment, significant TR was not an independent predictor of 2-year mortality. However, a significant interaction between TR and left ventricular systolic function was found. The response of TR to TAVR was extremely variable.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle