MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1706116208 · doi:10.1002/ccd.25512

Prevalence and impact of preoperative moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation on patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2014· article· en· W1706116208 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyRegurgitation (circulation)Confidence intervalValve replacementvalvular heart diseaseAortic valve replacementTricuspid valveLog-rank testEjection fractionAortic valveHeart failureSurvival analysisStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a marker for late-stage myocardial and valvular heart disease. Whether preoperative TR affects clinical outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has never been investigated. This study sought to identify the impact of moderate and severe TR on outcomes after TAVR. METHODS: All patients undergoing TAVR from January 2007 to August 2012 at St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, (n = 518) were dichotomized according to the severity of preoperative TR (moderate/severe vs. none/mild). All clinical outcomes were defined according to the valve academic research consortium-2 definitions. RESULTS: At baseline, moderate or severe TR was reported in 79 patients (15.2%). At 30 days, moderate/severe TR had improved in 12 patients (15.2%), was unchanged in 46 patients (58.3%), and worsened in 7 patients (8.9%). Of those with none/mild TR at baseline, 35 (7.9%) patients had moderate TR at 30-day follow-up. Two-year all-cause (38.4% vs. 20.0%, Log-rank test, P = 0.001) and cardiac mortality (12.9% vs. 4.6%, Log-rank test, P = 0.004) as estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis were considerably higher in patients with significant TR. However, significant TR did not emerge as independent risk factor for 2-year all-cause mortality (adjusted OR: 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-2.64, P = 0.105). Pre-specified subgroups showed an interaction between TR and left ventricular systolic function (Pinteraction = 0.047). Indeed, moderate/severe TR was significantly related to mortality only in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40% (adjusted OR: 2.01, CI: 1.05-3.84, P = 0.036). In patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, TR had no significant impact on all-cause mortality (adjusted OR: 1.04, CI: 0.34-3.16, P = 0.946). No significant interactions were identified regarding patients with perioperative moderate/severe mitral regurgitation (Pinteraction = 0.829) and patients with baseline systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 60 mm Hg (Pinteraction = 0.669). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TAVR, significant preoperative TR was present in 15% of patients and associated with more comorbidities. Despite being associated with a doubling of mortality rate, after a robust adjustment, significant TR was not an independent predictor of 2-year mortality. However, a significant interaction between TR and left ventricular systolic function was found. The response of TR to TAVR was extremely variable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it