MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1746697070

Putting Children First: A Guide For Parents Breaking Up

2006· article· en· W1746697070 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gary Shomair

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyPerspective (graphical)Scope (computer science)Process (computing)Sexual abuseSalientReading (process)Social psychologyComputer scienceMedicineHuman factors and ergonomicsPoison controlPolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This soft cover handbook is an extremely well thought overview of the issues that separating parents need to address conceptually and practically in planning and implementing as atraumatic an experience for their children as possible. It is not too detailed, prioritizes the issues in a logical fashion, and is organized to allow the reader the freedom to choose those sections that are most relevant to their own circumstances. Part I overviews the experience from the perspective of each parent, the child, and its implications on the specific manner in which the process would ideally unfold, highlighting the errors and attitudinal inclinations that are harmful to children and common to many separating parents. In italics, it provides clinical vignettes illustrating the points being made, while following these discussions with summarized succinct “boxes” that capture the essence being expressed. This permits the reader to highlight, while reading or with pen or pencil, the most salient and personally relevant passages. Part 2 addresses the more problematic issues that can arise in the complicated and conflicted separations, again providing both the parents’ and the child’s perspectives on these intense situations and their age-specific norms and patterns. This section includes the solutions parents can apply in their own attitudes, and questionnaires to help parents elicit these attitudes. Part 3 is a more detailed discussion about the assessment process when the courts are involved and addresses specialized issues that require unique discussion-the absent parent, spousal abuse, supervised access and sexual abuse allegations. The discussions are sufficient for the scope of a book of this type and the authors provide resources (names of contact groups, phone numbers in the Toronto area) for use by the reader. The main drawback of this book lies not in the book but more in how its usefulness could be extended and a more contemporary direction could be provided for the reader. Since this review was written six years after publication, any revision underway may already include the following comments. First, I would suggest the addition of useful web sites to the resources section. Second, the book would be ideal as an audio-tape or a CD to be listened to by the parent during their daily routine, as the writing style and content lends itself to an easy understanding of the concepts and rapid retention of their relevance. The book would, in such circumstances, ideally come with a CD or audiotape in a pocket of the cover or be available in both formats (written and audio). The biggest problem most separating parents have is finding the time to sit down and read. Alternate formats would facilitate learning the ideas easily and quickly so they might be applied as the parents suffer through the experience with their children – the time that most of these books tend to be purchased in the first place. Rare is the parent or parents who are able to plan the unfolding of their separation and such a book is most relevant when it can be used by those unable to plan. A variety of formats would make that more likely and thus bring even greater benefits for children in such circumstances. This book is not intended to be, and should not be seen as, the final word on how to handle the multiplicity of details related to separation and divorce as it impacts on kids. The comprehensive tomes by Dr. Richard Gardner and others have extensively addressed many of those details, as have other writers on separation and divorce since his groundbreaking approaches were written almost two decades ago. What this handbook does do, very well, is introduce parents to the most important ideas they need to keep central in their thinking and planning as they struggle with the adjustments to separation. It helps parents proceed with a focus on minimizing trauma to their kids when their minds are dominated by the trauma they themselves are experiencing. In that respect, it is the ideal gift to give to a friend or family member you know going through this difficult life transition. I would strongly recommend its use in such circumstances by both the participant in and the observer of these difficult situations. Reading this will go a long way to help all those around children whose parents are separating better understand how to be helpful to them in their pain, as well as empower the parents themselves at this trying time of their life.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,105
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,582

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareTravaux en français237 207