MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1750362307 · doi:10.1177/1715163515597243

Online clinical pathway for managing adults with chronic kidney disease

2015· article· en· W1750362307 sur OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Craig Curtis, Carlee Balint, Yazid N. Al Hamarneh, Maoliosa Donald, Ross T. Tsuyuki, Kerry McBrien, Wes Jackson, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueClinical practice guidelines implementation
Établissements canadiensFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Organismes subventionnairesCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
Mots-clésKidney diseaseMedicineDiseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Around one-tenth of the adults in Canada are affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.1 Early recognition of CKD is important, since timely implementation of lifestyle and pharmacological interventions can prevent it or slow its progression.2-4 Such interventions can also reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD)5,6—the primary cause of death in these patients.7 However, patients with CKD are often not recognized and do not receive optimal treatment because of complexities in care and failure to disseminate best practices.8-10 The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD clinical practice guidelines provide evidence for the evaluation and management of CKD.11 While clinical practice guidelines summarize evidence and provide recommendations, they are often difficult to apply in routine daily clinical activities. Clinical pathways are often derived from clinical practice guidelines but differ by providing more explicit and practical information about the sequence, timing and provision of interventions.12 A clinical pathway can be an effective tool to increase uptake of evidence-based health care by pharmacists and other primary care professionals in the community, who care for the majority of patients with CKD.13-15 Pharmacists in Canada have an expanding scope of practice; pharmacists can order laboratory tests, adapt new prescriptions, perform therapeutic substitutions, issue prescriptions for continuity of care and prescribe in emergency situations.16 In Alberta, pharmacists who have Additional Prescribing Authorization can prescribe at initial access or manage ongoing therapy based on their own assessment or in collaboration with another regulated health care professional.17 An integral part of pharmacists’ practice is working collaboratively and communicating with physicians and other health care providers.17 As pharmacists’ expanded scope of practice develops,16 tools such as the CKD Clinical Pathway (Figure 1) can assist pharmacists to implement evidence-based guidelines into their daily practice. This manuscript provides an overview of the clinical pathway for diagnosis, management and referral of adults with CKD and its potential clinical use for pharmacists. Figure 1 Overview of the adult CKD Clinical Pathway Development of the adult CKD Clinical Pathway The CKD Clinical Pathway is an online tool/guideline modeled after the successful National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical pathways (http://pathways.nice.org.uk). It was developed by a team of stakeholders that included pharmacists, nephrologists, primary care physicians, nurses, other health care professionals, IT specialists, web developers and designers. Usability and heuristic testing with primary care professionals has been completed, and the CKD Clinical Pathway has been available online since November 4, 2014 (www.CKDpathway.ca). The content in the CKD Clinical Pathway is evidence based and uses international and national guidelines, including the KDIGO CKD guidelines,11 KDIGO Lipid guidelines,18 C-CHANGE,19 Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) guidelines,20 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Lipid and Antiplatelet guidelines21,22 and Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines.23 This ensures that the recommendations are relevant and harmonized across Canada. Some of the content, such as the specialist referral form, is tailored to practice in Alberta. Users of the pathway should be aware that their local laboratory may report different reference ranges and units of measure than the laboratories in Alberta. Currently, laboratories in Alberta report estimated GFR using the CKD-EPI equation.24

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,507
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,218
Tête enseignante GPT0,440
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2015
Routes d'admission4
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaMême sujetClinical practice guidelines implementationTravaux en français237 207