MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1750362307 · doi:10.1177/1715163515597243

Online clinical pathway for managing adults with chronic kidney disease

2015· article· en· W1750362307 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Craig Curtis, Carlee Balint, Yazid N. Al Hamarneh, Maoliosa Donald, Ross T. Tsuyuki, Kerry McBrien, Wes Jackson, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
FundersCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
KeywordsKidney diseaseMedicineDiseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Around one-tenth of the adults in Canada are affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.1 Early recognition of CKD is important, since timely implementation of lifestyle and pharmacological interventions can prevent it or slow its progression.2-4 Such interventions can also reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD)5,6—the primary cause of death in these patients.7 However, patients with CKD are often not recognized and do not receive optimal treatment because of complexities in care and failure to disseminate best practices.8-10 The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD clinical practice guidelines provide evidence for the evaluation and management of CKD.11 While clinical practice guidelines summarize evidence and provide recommendations, they are often difficult to apply in routine daily clinical activities. Clinical pathways are often derived from clinical practice guidelines but differ by providing more explicit and practical information about the sequence, timing and provision of interventions.12 A clinical pathway can be an effective tool to increase uptake of evidence-based health care by pharmacists and other primary care professionals in the community, who care for the majority of patients with CKD.13-15 Pharmacists in Canada have an expanding scope of practice; pharmacists can order laboratory tests, adapt new prescriptions, perform therapeutic substitutions, issue prescriptions for continuity of care and prescribe in emergency situations.16 In Alberta, pharmacists who have Additional Prescribing Authorization can prescribe at initial access or manage ongoing therapy based on their own assessment or in collaboration with another regulated health care professional.17 An integral part of pharmacists’ practice is working collaboratively and communicating with physicians and other health care providers.17 As pharmacists’ expanded scope of practice develops,16 tools such as the CKD Clinical Pathway (Figure 1) can assist pharmacists to implement evidence-based guidelines into their daily practice. This manuscript provides an overview of the clinical pathway for diagnosis, management and referral of adults with CKD and its potential clinical use for pharmacists. Figure 1 Overview of the adult CKD Clinical Pathway Development of the adult CKD Clinical Pathway The CKD Clinical Pathway is an online tool/guideline modeled after the successful National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical pathways (http://pathways.nice.org.uk). It was developed by a team of stakeholders that included pharmacists, nephrologists, primary care physicians, nurses, other health care professionals, IT specialists, web developers and designers. Usability and heuristic testing with primary care professionals has been completed, and the CKD Clinical Pathway has been available online since November 4, 2014 (www.CKDpathway.ca). The content in the CKD Clinical Pathway is evidence based and uses international and national guidelines, including the KDIGO CKD guidelines,11 KDIGO Lipid guidelines,18 C-CHANGE,19 Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) guidelines,20 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Lipid and Antiplatelet guidelines21,22 and Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines.23 This ensures that the recommendations are relevant and harmonized across Canada. Some of the content, such as the specialist referral form, is tailored to practice in Alberta. Users of the pathway should be aware that their local laboratory may report different reference ranges and units of measure than the laboratories in Alberta. Currently, laboratories in Alberta report estimated GFR using the CKD-EPI equation.24

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2290.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207