Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Beyond “The Trouble with Wilderness” Laura Rigal (bio) A Keener Perception: Ecocritical Studies in American Art History. Edited by Alan C. Braddock and Christoph Irmscher. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2009. 304 pages. $60.00 (cloth). $29.95 (paper). Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian. Edited by Michael E. Harkin and David Rich Lewis. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2007. 370 pages. $24.95 (paper). Since the late 1970s, first-wave environmentalism—from the Sierra Club and Earth Day to ecofeminism, deep ecology, and EarthFirst!—has been roundly and righteously criticized as romantic ideology, religio-spiritual irrationality, and recreational escapism. Some of the sharpest critics have been in literary and cultural studies. Working in the vein of anticolonialist and poststructuralist semiotics, cultural critics of the 1980s and ’90s argued that “nature” (like “woman” or “wilderness”) was the culturally constructed phantasm of historically contingent sign systems, or the ideological “reality effect” of social domination under capitalism. At the same time, on another side of the culture wars, critics in the social sciences attacked the myths and symbols of romantic environmentalism on empirical grounds. Rejecting poststructuralist cultural studies, discourse analysis, and new historicism, data-centered anthropologists and historians took comfort in the disciplinary boundaries set by what Bruno Latour calls “factish” argument,1 grounded in actual, rather than constructed, evidence. The two essay collections reviewed here both confront, to very different ends, the 1990s critiques of environmentalist cultural politics as romantic ideology. In the environmental humanities, A Keener Perception: Ecocritical Studies in American Art History extends and challenges the cultural studies critique of “wilderness,” as summarized by environmental historian William Cronon in his 1995 essay “The Trouble with Wilderness or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature.”2 In the environmental social sciences, Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian revisits and deepens the late 1990s controversy over Shepherd Krech III’s highly effective, empiricist attack on the [End Page 989] romantic myth of the inherently “ecological” behavior of American Indians, in The Ecological Indian, Myth and History (1999).3 With “ecocritical” in the title and a foreword by literary scholar Lawrence Buell, A Keener Perception initially identifies itself with the environmental turn in American literary studies. But Braddock and Irmscher’s remarkable foray into art historical ecocriticism goes well beyond the precedence of literary criticism to find itself in more uneven, and more definitively historical, topography. Organized chronologically, with twelve essays spanning more than three centuries, the collection includes literary scholars, art historians, and professors of architecture and history. It construes visual art broadly, with analyses of early American natural history illustration (Theodore DeBry, William Bartram, Antoine Sonrel, Louis Agassiz), nineteenth- and twentieth-century landscape painting (Thomas Cole, Asher Durand, Albert Bierstadt, Alexandre Hogue, Aaron Douglass), modernist eco-architecture (Buckminster Fuller), Navajo chant weaving (Alberta Thomas), and photography (Carleton Watkins, Elliot Porter, Subhankar Banerjee). Eminently teachable across several disciplines, the book demonstrates that if art historians have learned much from environmental literary studies, scholars of literature and culture have much to learn from art history about how to read visual artifacts historically (and “ethically”) within fluid contexts of socioeconomic, cultural, and ecological change. In contrast, the sharp-edged debates among ethnohistorians, anthropologists, and American Indian/Native studies scholars in Native Americans and the Environment are clustered around a site of epistemological and ideological gridlock. Many of these essays emerged from a 2002 conference occasioned by the publication of Krech’s controversial The Ecological Indian, in which Krech, an environmental historian and anthropologist, debunked the environmentalist storyline that American Indians practiced conservation (i.e., rational natural resource management) prior to European contact. Deploying data from the Pleistocene extinction to the North American fur trade, Krech argued that, in historical fact, the behaviors of Native communities often ran contrary to the green dream of the ecological or environmentalist Indian. Offering a range of divided perspectives on Krech’s claim to tell the truth about pre- and postcontact harvesting and hunting behavior, Native Americans and the Environment goes to the heart of American Indian and Native studies’ troubled relationship with the putatively disinterested methods of academic anthropologists and ethnohistorians. Impressively, every essay in Native Americans and the Environment...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».