MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1752081298 · doi:10.1353/aq.2010.a409349

Beyond “The Trouble with Wilderness”

2010· article· en· W1752081298 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Rigal

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmentalismIdeologyWildernessSociologyPoliticsAestheticsEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beyond “The Trouble with Wilderness” Laura Rigal (bio) A Keener Perception: Ecocritical Studies in American Art History. Edited by Alan C. Braddock and Christoph Irmscher. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2009. 304 pages. $60.00 (cloth). $29.95 (paper). Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian. Edited by Michael E. Harkin and David Rich Lewis. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2007. 370 pages. $24.95 (paper). Since the late 1970s, first-wave environmentalism—from the Sierra Club and Earth Day to ecofeminism, deep ecology, and EarthFirst!—has been roundly and righteously criticized as romantic ideology, religio-spiritual irrationality, and recreational escapism. Some of the sharpest critics have been in literary and cultural studies. Working in the vein of anticolonialist and poststructuralist semiotics, cultural critics of the 1980s and ’90s argued that “nature” (like “woman” or “wilderness”) was the culturally constructed phantasm of historically contingent sign systems, or the ideological “reality effect” of social domination under capitalism. At the same time, on another side of the culture wars, critics in the social sciences attacked the myths and symbols of romantic environmentalism on empirical grounds. Rejecting poststructuralist cultural studies, discourse analysis, and new historicism, data-centered anthropologists and historians took comfort in the disciplinary boundaries set by what Bruno Latour calls “factish” argument,1 grounded in actual, rather than constructed, evidence. The two essay collections reviewed here both confront, to very different ends, the 1990s critiques of environmentalist cultural politics as romantic ideology. In the environmental humanities, A Keener Perception: Ecocritical Studies in American Art History extends and challenges the cultural studies critique of “wilderness,” as summarized by environmental historian William Cronon in his 1995 essay “The Trouble with Wilderness or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature.”2 In the environmental social sciences, Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian revisits and deepens the late 1990s controversy over Shepherd Krech III’s highly effective, empiricist attack on the [End Page 989] romantic myth of the inherently “ecological” behavior of American Indians, in The Ecological Indian, Myth and History (1999).3 With “ecocritical” in the title and a foreword by literary scholar Lawrence Buell, A Keener Perception initially identifies itself with the environmental turn in American literary studies. But Braddock and Irmscher’s remarkable foray into art historical ecocriticism goes well beyond the precedence of literary criticism to find itself in more uneven, and more definitively historical, topography. Organized chronologically, with twelve essays spanning more than three centuries, the collection includes literary scholars, art historians, and professors of architecture and history. It construes visual art broadly, with analyses of early American natural history illustration (Theodore DeBry, William Bartram, Antoine Sonrel, Louis Agassiz), nineteenth- and twentieth-century landscape painting (Thomas Cole, Asher Durand, Albert Bierstadt, Alexandre Hogue, Aaron Douglass), modernist eco-architecture (Buckminster Fuller), Navajo chant weaving (Alberta Thomas), and photography (Carleton Watkins, Elliot Porter, Subhankar Banerjee). Eminently teachable across several disciplines, the book demonstrates that if art historians have learned much from environmental literary studies, scholars of literature and culture have much to learn from art history about how to read visual artifacts historically (and “ethically”) within fluid contexts of socioeconomic, cultural, and ecological change. In contrast, the sharp-edged debates among ethnohistorians, anthropologists, and American Indian/Native studies scholars in Native Americans and the Environment are clustered around a site of epistemological and ideological gridlock. Many of these essays emerged from a 2002 conference occasioned by the publication of Krech’s controversial The Ecological Indian, in which Krech, an environmental historian and anthropologist, debunked the environmentalist storyline that American Indians practiced conservation (i.e., rational natural resource management) prior to European contact. Deploying data from the Pleistocene extinction to the North American fur trade, Krech argued that, in historical fact, the behaviors of Native communities often ran contrary to the green dream of the ecological or environmentalist Indian. Offering a range of divided perspectives on Krech’s claim to tell the truth about pre- and postcontact harvesting and hunting behavior, Native Americans and the Environment goes to the heart of American Indian and Native studies’ troubled relationship with the putatively disinterested methods of academic anthropologists and ethnohistorians. Impressively, every essay in Native Americans and the Environment...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.033
Scholarly communication0.0100.014
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican QuarterlySame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207