MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1758370176

RAISING THE DEAD: ORGAN TRANSPLANTS, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY.

2003· article· en· W1758370176 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaroslav Barwinsky

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOrgan donationMedicinePresentation (obstetrics)Economic JusticeEngineering ethicsTransplantationMedical educationLawSurgery
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

RAISING THE DEAD: ORGAN TRANSPLANTS, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY. Ronald Munson. 304 pp. Oxford University Press, 2002. Can$48. ISBN 0195132998 This novel-like publication, based on case presentations yet with monographic characteristics, outlines in a detailed descriptive fashion complex problems of the science of organ transplants, related ethical-social values, including cost considerations and relevant distributive justice issues. The format and contents of each presentation are enjoyable, clear and could be easily utilized at seminars or other teaching sessions with medical students, residents and academic teaching staff. In addition, the language of the presentations is lucid and easily understandable by the public at large. This will likely encourage and enhance our societal intellectual interests and virtuous ethical desire in search of the truth in evolving science, technology and therapeutics to which we have the right of access and the right to know, adding positive contributions to our organ donation process. The book is divided into several chapters, dealing with the specifics of different organ transplants, such as liver, heart (both adult and neonatal), kidneys, and xenotransplantation. It describes in a positive way the science and technology of stem-cell research, including some of our present clinical therapeutic considerations. The criteria for donor selection, including definitions of death and brain death are well presented and explained. These criteria are based on scientific physiological and moral definitions accepted both in North America and universally. In some regions this is affected by cultural and religious values, but these are usually respected. The issue of selling organs is also mentioned, but it is not practised in Western countries and in democratic societies. As expected, the organ donation process is very painful to families, relatives and friends of a donor. In light of that, special behavioural and consultative approaches are recommended as mandatory. They require specialized personnel, trained to handle these problems. Each patient requiring organ transplantation is carefully assessed, based on the severity of illness, indications for transplantation, selectivity or prioritization process and availability of a suitable donor. This is reinforced by detailed statistical analysis for each organ transplant group, analysis that also includes the length of the waiting list, associated mortality, comorbidity and final outcome. It is further subdivided into regional analysis, which gives the reader some idea of how the issues of organ transplantation are managed across the country. Since most of the collected information in this book came from major centres in the United States, discussion of the practice of organ transplantation in our Canadian system is not included, but the applicability of this process in Canada is obvious. Occasionally among certain groups of our society or in certain regions, the notion of preferential selectivity, based on social or economic status, creates strong criticism and anger. The author has analyzed this issue in comparison with biological and statistical data associated with the recipient-donor matching process and has concluded that usually preferential selection does not exist. The other controversial problems mentioned in the text are related to concomitant illness such as uncontrolled alcoholism in liver cirrhosis or undetected localized hepatic malignant disease. The discussions provided in the text are thorough and will serve as an educational background for many readers. Of special, although limited, interest are discussions of anencephalic newborns, heart transplantation in newborns for life-threatening congenital heart disease and the use of xenotransplantation. These difficult issues will continue to be at the forefront of scientific challenges. In summary, this text is a valuable and much needed contribution to the scientific literature. It is unique, since it effectively combines clinical science with ethical principles, including distributive justice. It could be used as an educational reference for medical students, residents and others, including medical ethicists. It will also have an impact on public opinion and may enhance the donor awareness programs and organ donation process in Canada. Jaroslaw Barwinsky, MD Professor Emeritus Department of Surgery, Cardiac Surgery University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Man.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,213
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,232

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetOrgan Donation and TransplantationTravaux en français237 207