MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1758370176

RAISING THE DEAD: ORGAN TRANSPLANTS, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY.

2003· article· en· W1758370176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaroslav Barwinsky

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrgan donationMedicinePresentation (obstetrics)Economic JusticeEngineering ethicsTransplantationMedical educationLawSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RAISING THE DEAD: ORGAN TRANSPLANTS, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY. Ronald Munson. 304 pp. Oxford University Press, 2002. Can$48. ISBN 0195132998 This novel-like publication, based on case presentations yet with monographic characteristics, outlines in a detailed descriptive fashion complex problems of the science of organ transplants, related ethical-social values, including cost considerations and relevant distributive justice issues. The format and contents of each presentation are enjoyable, clear and could be easily utilized at seminars or other teaching sessions with medical students, residents and academic teaching staff. In addition, the language of the presentations is lucid and easily understandable by the public at large. This will likely encourage and enhance our societal intellectual interests and virtuous ethical desire in search of the truth in evolving science, technology and therapeutics to which we have the right of access and the right to know, adding positive contributions to our organ donation process. The book is divided into several chapters, dealing with the specifics of different organ transplants, such as liver, heart (both adult and neonatal), kidneys, and xenotransplantation. It describes in a positive way the science and technology of stem-cell research, including some of our present clinical therapeutic considerations. The criteria for donor selection, including definitions of death and brain death are well presented and explained. These criteria are based on scientific physiological and moral definitions accepted both in North America and universally. In some regions this is affected by cultural and religious values, but these are usually respected. The issue of selling organs is also mentioned, but it is not practised in Western countries and in democratic societies. As expected, the organ donation process is very painful to families, relatives and friends of a donor. In light of that, special behavioural and consultative approaches are recommended as mandatory. They require specialized personnel, trained to handle these problems. Each patient requiring organ transplantation is carefully assessed, based on the severity of illness, indications for transplantation, selectivity or prioritization process and availability of a suitable donor. This is reinforced by detailed statistical analysis for each organ transplant group, analysis that also includes the length of the waiting list, associated mortality, comorbidity and final outcome. It is further subdivided into regional analysis, which gives the reader some idea of how the issues of organ transplantation are managed across the country. Since most of the collected information in this book came from major centres in the United States, discussion of the practice of organ transplantation in our Canadian system is not included, but the applicability of this process in Canada is obvious. Occasionally among certain groups of our society or in certain regions, the notion of preferential selectivity, based on social or economic status, creates strong criticism and anger. The author has analyzed this issue in comparison with biological and statistical data associated with the recipient-donor matching process and has concluded that usually preferential selection does not exist. The other controversial problems mentioned in the text are related to concomitant illness such as uncontrolled alcoholism in liver cirrhosis or undetected localized hepatic malignant disease. The discussions provided in the text are thorough and will serve as an educational background for many readers. Of special, although limited, interest are discussions of anencephalic newborns, heart transplantation in newborns for life-threatening congenital heart disease and the use of xenotransplantation. These difficult issues will continue to be at the forefront of scientific challenges. In summary, this text is a valuable and much needed contribution to the scientific literature. It is unique, since it effectively combines clinical science with ethical principles, including distributive justice. It could be used as an educational reference for medical students, residents and others, including medical ethicists. It will also have an impact on public opinion and may enhance the donor awareness programs and organ donation process in Canada. Jaroslaw Barwinsky, MD Professor Emeritus Department of Surgery, Cardiac Surgery University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Man.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207