MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W188893925

Furnishing Louisiana: Creole and Acadian Furniture, 1735-1835

2012· article· en· W188893925 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth Hafertepe

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Southern History · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArchaeologyHistoryColonialismArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Furnishing Louisiana: and Acadian Furniture, 1735-1835. Edited by Jessica Dorman and Sarah R. Doerries. (New Orleans: Historic New Orleans Collection, 2010. Pp. [xiv], 537. $95.00, ISBN 978-0-917860-56-0.) The Furniture of John Shearer, 1790-1820: A True North Britain in the Southern Backcountry. By Elizabeth A. Davison. (Lanham, Md., and other cities: AltaMira Press, c. 2011. Pp. [xx], 219. $99.00, ISBN 978-07591-1954-3.) These two volumes deal with aspects of the furniture of the colonial and U.S. South, addressing different areas within the region and with very different scopes. Furnishing and Acadian Furniture, 1735-1835 is a monumental survey of furniture made and used in Louisiana between 1735 and 1835. The Furniture of John Shearer, 1790-1820: A True North Britain in the Southern Backcountry focuses on the work of one cabinetmaker in the Virginia and Maryland backcountry between 1790 and 1820. Both books in their own way contribute to our knowledge of southern furniture. In 1949 Joseph Downs, a curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, suggested that little of artistic merit was made south of Baltimore, which became a rallying point for students of southern furniture and decorative arts (Dorman and Doerries, p. 3). Yet until recently, furniture of the southern backcountry--the Piedmont and beyond--took a backseat to the products of the Chesapeake and the Carolina Lowcountry. And areas like Louisiana were simply on their own. Furnishing Louisiana is a large and beautiful volume, published by the Historic New Orleans Collection. It represents a huge leap forward in the study of its subject, while acknowledging earlier scholars such as Jessie J. Poesch, author of Early Furniture of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1972). The lead authors of the present volume, Jack D. Holden and H. Parrott Bacot, bring the perspectives of a longtime private collector and a veteran museum professional, respectively. Additional contributors are Cybele T. Gontar, who writes on furniture importation into New Orleans and on the Campeche chair in Louisiana, and who is the coauthor, with Holden, of an essay on e'benisterie (veneer work and pictorial inlay) in Louisiana; Brian J. Costello, who takes the reader Inside the Early Louisiana Home; and Francis J. Puig, who explores furniture from the upper Mississippi River Valley. The book contains over 1,200 full-color illustrations, most of them photographs by Jim Zietz, a wonderful resource in their own right. The authors present a vast array of Louisiana furniture, including 117 armoires as well as chairs, benches, beds, cradles, tables, desks and other case pieces, clocks, and utilitarian objects. Holden's own extensive collection is prominently featured, as are many other collections private and public. The balance tips toward the private, which is good in that it provides excellent documentation of many pieces that are as accessible as those in museums, but so good in that the authors' expertise is focused less on artifacts now on public display. The authors make a distinction between furniture, made in New Orleans or its cultural hinterlands and combining French, Spanish, and Anglo-American styles, and Acadian furniture, made by refugees from French Canada who settled in southwestern Louisiana. The authors imply that all Louisiana furniture was creolized, even in the earliest period of colonization, but they hedge that bet in the chapter on armoires. Here earlier armoires, made before 1790 and not acculturated, are termed and those after 1790, Creole (p. 142). If there are prominent stylistic elements, the description becomes Colonial Armoire in the Baroque Manner (p. 142). In other regions these features might be termed a colonial (or provincial) version of a given style, but there seems to be a desire to declare the style as distinctive. Once into the style proper, the authors arrange the furniture by structural or decorative techniques. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,540
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,176
Écart entre enseignants0,165 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Southern HistoryMême sujetAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryTravaux en français237 207