MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W188893925

Furnishing Louisiana: Creole and Acadian Furniture, 1735-1835

2012· article· en· W188893925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth Hafertepe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Southern History · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyHistoryColonialismArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Furnishing Louisiana: and Acadian Furniture, 1735-1835. Edited by Jessica Dorman and Sarah R. Doerries. (New Orleans: Historic New Orleans Collection, 2010. Pp. [xiv], 537. $95.00, ISBN 978-0-917860-56-0.) The Furniture of John Shearer, 1790-1820: A True North Britain in the Southern Backcountry. By Elizabeth A. Davison. (Lanham, Md., and other cities: AltaMira Press, c. 2011. Pp. [xx], 219. $99.00, ISBN 978-07591-1954-3.) These two volumes deal with aspects of the furniture of the colonial and U.S. South, addressing different areas within the region and with very different scopes. Furnishing and Acadian Furniture, 1735-1835 is a monumental survey of furniture made and used in Louisiana between 1735 and 1835. The Furniture of John Shearer, 1790-1820: A True North Britain in the Southern Backcountry focuses on the work of one cabinetmaker in the Virginia and Maryland backcountry between 1790 and 1820. Both books in their own way contribute to our knowledge of southern furniture. In 1949 Joseph Downs, a curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, suggested that little of artistic merit was made south of Baltimore, which became a rallying point for students of southern furniture and decorative arts (Dorman and Doerries, p. 3). Yet until recently, furniture of the southern backcountry--the Piedmont and beyond--took a backseat to the products of the Chesapeake and the Carolina Lowcountry. And areas like Louisiana were simply on their own. Furnishing Louisiana is a large and beautiful volume, published by the Historic New Orleans Collection. It represents a huge leap forward in the study of its subject, while acknowledging earlier scholars such as Jessie J. Poesch, author of Early Furniture of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1972). The lead authors of the present volume, Jack D. Holden and H. Parrott Bacot, bring the perspectives of a longtime private collector and a veteran museum professional, respectively. Additional contributors are Cybele T. Gontar, who writes on furniture importation into New Orleans and on the Campeche chair in Louisiana, and who is the coauthor, with Holden, of an essay on e'benisterie (veneer work and pictorial inlay) in Louisiana; Brian J. Costello, who takes the reader Inside the Early Louisiana Home; and Francis J. Puig, who explores furniture from the upper Mississippi River Valley. The book contains over 1,200 full-color illustrations, most of them photographs by Jim Zietz, a wonderful resource in their own right. The authors present a vast array of Louisiana furniture, including 117 armoires as well as chairs, benches, beds, cradles, tables, desks and other case pieces, clocks, and utilitarian objects. Holden's own extensive collection is prominently featured, as are many other collections private and public. The balance tips toward the private, which is good in that it provides excellent documentation of many pieces that are as accessible as those in museums, but so good in that the authors' expertise is focused less on artifacts now on public display. The authors make a distinction between furniture, made in New Orleans or its cultural hinterlands and combining French, Spanish, and Anglo-American styles, and Acadian furniture, made by refugees from French Canada who settled in southwestern Louisiana. The authors imply that all Louisiana furniture was creolized, even in the earliest period of colonization, but they hedge that bet in the chapter on armoires. Here earlier armoires, made before 1790 and not acculturated, are termed and those after 1790, Creole (p. 142). If there are prominent stylistic elements, the description becomes Colonial Armoire in the Baroque Manner (p. 142). In other regions these features might be termed a colonial (or provincial) version of a given style, but there seems to be a desire to declare the style as distinctive. Once into the style proper, the authors arrange the furniture by structural or decorative techniques. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Southern HistorySame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207