<i>New Approaches to Medieval Architecture</i>, edited by Robert Bork, William W. Clark, and Abby McGehee.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Approaches to Medieval edited by Robert Bork, William W. Clark, and Abby McGehee. AVISTA Studies in the History of Medieval Technology, Science and Art, volume 8. Burlington, Vermont, Ashgate, 2011. xiii, 244 pp. $119.95 US (cloth). This book is the eighth volume of the Studies in the History of Medieval Technology, Science and Art series published by AVISTA (Association Villard de Honnecourt for Interdisciplinary Study of Medieval Technology, Science and Art), a scholarly organization whose main purpose is to promote the study of medieval works of art and architecture relating to the practical sciences or technology. articles in this volume result from conference papers presented by AVISTA members at the International Congress on Medieval Studies, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, between 2007 and 2009. book containing sixteen articles is divided into four sections which reflect as many different interpretative strategies for the study of medieval architecture. introduction traces the main landmarks in the development of medieval--although mostly Gothic--architectural history in the second half of the twentieth century. new approaches in the field come as a breath of fresh air after fifty years during which architectural historians first drew particular attention to the formal and aesthetic aspects of medieval architecture, then shifted their interest towards a more inclusive conception of architecture they saw further as a social space, and finally--in the last decade of the twentieth century--made the cultural and technical environment of architecture a key point of focus. unquestionable experience of the editors--distinguished architectural historians Robert Bork, William W. Clark, and Abby McGehee--is undoubtedly perceptible in the way they quite cleverly grouped the articles illustrating the current state of research, certainly a difficult task on account of the authors' varied approaches and goals. In Part 1, Re-assessing the Master of Narratives of Medieval Architecture, the authors propose a revaluation of the past categorization and discourses on Byzantine (N. Camerlenghi and V. Marinis) and French Gothic. churches (E. Shortell and S. Murray) in the light of recent discoveries resulting from the use of new technologies. In Part 2, The Patronage and Institutional Context of Medieval Architecture, it is more about the intentions of patrons and artists beyond the material evidence, which are highlighted by the authors (W.W. Clark and T.G. Waldman; C.F. Barnes Jr. and M.M. Reeve) quite efficiently using surviving primary sources such as liturgical records, charters, drawings and courtesy literature. Part 3, Geometry and Workshop Practice in Medieval Architecture, explores aspects of workshop practices related to medieval architecture such as the standardization of the stone cutting in the making of column statues (J.E. Snyder), the empirical versus the scientific planning of space as a conscious choice in the planning of church design (N. Hiscock and S. Van Liefferinge), and Villard de Honnecourt's dual conception of architecture resulting from the combination of the information he gleaned in the Reims Cathedral building workshop with his imagination (R. Bork). Part 4, New Technologies for the Study of Medieval Architecture, examines the contribution of modern tools and techniques such as ground-penetrating radars (V. Paul, S. Udphuay, M. Everett and R. Warden), photogrammetric technique (H. Titus), computer-controlled lasers and scanners (L. Reilly, C. Keller and E. Triplett, A. Tallon), and visualization technology (M. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».