MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W189506852 · doi:10.3138/cjh.47.3.623

<i>New Approaches to Medieval Architecture</i>, edited by Robert Bork, William W. Clark, and Abby McGehee.

2012· article· en· W189506852 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Claire Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArchitectureVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approaches to Medieval edited by Robert Bork, William W. Clark, and Abby McGehee. AVISTA Studies in the History of Medieval Technology, Science and Art, volume 8. Burlington, Vermont, Ashgate, 2011. xiii, 244 pp. $119.95 US (cloth). This book is the eighth volume of the Studies in the History of Medieval Technology, Science and Art series published by AVISTA (Association Villard de Honnecourt for Interdisciplinary Study of Medieval Technology, Science and Art), a scholarly organization whose main purpose is to promote the study of medieval works of art and architecture relating to the practical sciences or technology. articles in this volume result from conference papers presented by AVISTA members at the International Congress on Medieval Studies, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, between 2007 and 2009. book containing sixteen articles is divided into four sections which reflect as many different interpretative strategies for the study of medieval architecture. introduction traces the main landmarks in the development of medieval--although mostly Gothic--architectural history in the second half of the twentieth century. new approaches in the field come as a breath of fresh air after fifty years during which architectural historians first drew particular attention to the formal and aesthetic aspects of medieval architecture, then shifted their interest towards a more inclusive conception of architecture they saw further as a social space, and finally--in the last decade of the twentieth century--made the cultural and technical environment of architecture a key point of focus. unquestionable experience of the editors--distinguished architectural historians Robert Bork, William W. Clark, and Abby McGehee--is undoubtedly perceptible in the way they quite cleverly grouped the articles illustrating the current state of research, certainly a difficult task on account of the authors' varied approaches and goals. In Part 1, Re-assessing the Master of Narratives of Medieval Architecture, the authors propose a revaluation of the past categorization and discourses on Byzantine (N. Camerlenghi and V. Marinis) and French Gothic. churches (E. Shortell and S. Murray) in the light of recent discoveries resulting from the use of new technologies. In Part 2, The Patronage and Institutional Context of Medieval Architecture, it is more about the intentions of patrons and artists beyond the material evidence, which are highlighted by the authors (W.W. Clark and T.G. Waldman; C.F. Barnes Jr. and M.M. Reeve) quite efficiently using surviving primary sources such as liturgical records, charters, drawings and courtesy literature. Part 3, Geometry and Workshop Practice in Medieval Architecture, explores aspects of workshop practices related to medieval architecture such as the standardization of the stone cutting in the making of column statues (J.E. Snyder), the empirical versus the scientific planning of space as a conscious choice in the planning of church design (N. Hiscock and S. Van Liefferinge), and Villard de Honnecourt's dual conception of architecture resulting from the combination of the information he gleaned in the Reims Cathedral building workshop with his imagination (R. Bork). Part 4, New Technologies for the Study of Medieval Architecture, examines the contribution of modern tools and techniques such as ground-penetrating radars (V. Paul, S. Udphuay, M. Everett and R. Warden), photogrammetric technique (H. Titus), computer-controlled lasers and scanners (L. Reilly, C. Keller and E. Triplett, A. Tallon), and visualization technology (M. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207