MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1929173761 · doi:10.1017/s0265021505210955

Notable Names in Anaesthesia

2005· article· en· W1929173761 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. W. Green

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedical History and Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMillerClassicsHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Notable Names in Anaesthesia. J. R. Maltby (ed.). Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd.: London, UK, 2002, 254 pp; indexed, illustrated ISBN: 1-85315-512-8; Price £19.50 In his introduction, Roger Maltby recalls how he noted the lack of inclusion of any anaesthetists in Bailey and Bishop's Notable Names in Medicine and Surgery and how this (disgraceful) omission was the stimulus for producing this book. I suppose as anaesthetists we would not find this omission surprising. However, we should serendipitously be grateful, as it has led to the production of this enormously engaging book. In all there are 76 mini biographies of some of the most famous names associated with anaesthesia; the majority are by Roger Maltby himself whilst some are autobiographical (e.g. John Nunn, Leslie Rendell-Baker and Cecil Gray). Non-anaesthetists are obviously included (clearly we are not so parochial as our medical and surgical colleagues) such as Bier, Esmarch, Melzack, Wall and Koller as well as manufacturers such as Foregger and King. It should be said that the emphasis is on those who produced eponymous devices, books or manoeuvres rather than those prominent in the research field. Inevitably one will ponder on the missing names as well as those who are perhaps less worthy of inclusion. So, although benefactors such as Lord Nuffield are rightly included, Henry Isaiah Dorr, who preceded him by endowing the first Professorial Chair in Anaesthesia in the USA is not, UK anaesthetists have little contact with the Berman airway or the Miller laryngoscope blade although as an anaesthetist working in Canada, Roger Maltby obviously has to maintain a different perspective. However, I would certainly have wished to see a monograph on Lucien Morris and his Copper Kettle and on Hale Enderby, the pioneer of ‘hypotensive anaesthesia’. Nevertheless, this book is totally engrossing. The monograph on Ringer and Hartmann (mainly taken form Alfred Lee's 1981 paper in Anaesthesia) should be compulsory reading for all juniors who must be bemused by the fact that Lactated Ringer's USP and Hartmann's solution BP (both with virtually the same electrolyte content) are named after the Englishman in the USA and the American in the UK! There are also wonderful thumbnail sketches of major developments in anaesthesia and how they came about including the circumstances behind the foundation of the Nuffield Chair of Anaesthesia in Oxford. This is described in some detail in the monographs on Mackintosh and Lord Nuffield. Perhaps the most fascinating parts are those outlining the development of equipment, especially those used in every day practice to this day. The events surrounding the invention of the laryngeal mask, Mackintosh laryngoscope, Mapleson D and Bain circuits should remind anaesthetists to always keep a ‘prepared mind’ for the possibility of future inventions to benefit the practice of anaesthesia. Having said that, the restrictions we now encounter in clinical practice, the disappearance of the small manufacturing companies and well-equipped medical engineering departments in hospitals, as well as the enormous cost of patent protection, means that we are unlikely to find many names to add to those in this book in future years. That is a pity. D. W. Green a1London, UK

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,919
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Journal of AnaesthesiologyMême sujetMedical History and InnovationsTravaux en français237 207