MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1929173761 · doi:10.1017/s0265021505210955

Notable Names in Anaesthesia

2005· article· en· W1929173761 on OpenAlex
D. W. Green

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMillerClassicsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notable Names in Anaesthesia. J. R. Maltby (ed.). Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd.: London, UK, 2002, 254 pp; indexed, illustrated ISBN: 1-85315-512-8; Price £19.50 In his introduction, Roger Maltby recalls how he noted the lack of inclusion of any anaesthetists in Bailey and Bishop's Notable Names in Medicine and Surgery and how this (disgraceful) omission was the stimulus for producing this book. I suppose as anaesthetists we would not find this omission surprising. However, we should serendipitously be grateful, as it has led to the production of this enormously engaging book. In all there are 76 mini biographies of some of the most famous names associated with anaesthesia; the majority are by Roger Maltby himself whilst some are autobiographical (e.g. John Nunn, Leslie Rendell-Baker and Cecil Gray). Non-anaesthetists are obviously included (clearly we are not so parochial as our medical and surgical colleagues) such as Bier, Esmarch, Melzack, Wall and Koller as well as manufacturers such as Foregger and King. It should be said that the emphasis is on those who produced eponymous devices, books or manoeuvres rather than those prominent in the research field. Inevitably one will ponder on the missing names as well as those who are perhaps less worthy of inclusion. So, although benefactors such as Lord Nuffield are rightly included, Henry Isaiah Dorr, who preceded him by endowing the first Professorial Chair in Anaesthesia in the USA is not, UK anaesthetists have little contact with the Berman airway or the Miller laryngoscope blade although as an anaesthetist working in Canada, Roger Maltby obviously has to maintain a different perspective. However, I would certainly have wished to see a monograph on Lucien Morris and his Copper Kettle and on Hale Enderby, the pioneer of ‘hypotensive anaesthesia’. Nevertheless, this book is totally engrossing. The monograph on Ringer and Hartmann (mainly taken form Alfred Lee's 1981 paper in Anaesthesia) should be compulsory reading for all juniors who must be bemused by the fact that Lactated Ringer's USP and Hartmann's solution BP (both with virtually the same electrolyte content) are named after the Englishman in the USA and the American in the UK! There are also wonderful thumbnail sketches of major developments in anaesthesia and how they came about including the circumstances behind the foundation of the Nuffield Chair of Anaesthesia in Oxford. This is described in some detail in the monographs on Mackintosh and Lord Nuffield. Perhaps the most fascinating parts are those outlining the development of equipment, especially those used in every day practice to this day. The events surrounding the invention of the laryngeal mask, Mackintosh laryngoscope, Mapleson D and Bain circuits should remind anaesthetists to always keep a ‘prepared mind’ for the possibility of future inventions to benefit the practice of anaesthesia. Having said that, the restrictions we now encounter in clinical practice, the disappearance of the small manufacturing companies and well-equipped medical engineering departments in hospitals, as well as the enormous cost of patent protection, means that we are unlikely to find many names to add to those in this book in future years. That is a pity. D. W. Green a1London, UK

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it