MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W192947453

P. Dawson & R. Guare. (2009). Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary "Executive Skills" Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential

2009· article· en· W192947453 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tim Claypool

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCredibilityDilemmaPsychologyWonderEconomic shortagePublic relationsSociologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

P. Dawson & R. Guare. (2009). Smart But Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential. New York: The Guildford Press. 314 pages. ISBN: 978 1 59385 445 4 If you have stopped by your local bookstore lately, you may have noticed that there is no shortage of self-help books. Parents, in particular, are a vulnerable target audience for quasi-scientific writers aiming to offer anything from childrearing advice to boosting their children's brainpower. The book in question, Smart But Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential by Peg Dawson and Richard Guare falls within a unique subsection of this self-help/advice giving genre. It promises readers that it show you how you can modify the daily experience of a child aged 4 to 14 to build the that will make it possible for the child to get on track and get things done (p. 2). An attractive sales pitch indeed, without falling into the diagnostic dilemma of targeting only individuals with specific disorders of attention. Instead the authors choose to use a more inclusive approach, where prospective readers may be left wondering who would not benefit from boosting their own powers of self-control and organization, never mind their children's. The authors exude credibility, with Drs. Dawson and Guare reporting to have had over 30 years of field experience working with children who have difficulties with learning, attention, and behavior disorders. Not to diminish Peg Dawson's worthy accomplishments, it is comforting to note that Richard Guare is a neuropsychologist because their book addresses issues of functioning in general, and behavior paradigms in particular. Just so the reader does not confuse executive skills with preparing their child for life in the corporate world, the authors make it clear that they are referring to brain-based that are required for humans to execute, or perform tasks (p. 13). More specifically, their model is subdivided into a set of 11 developmentally and functionally differentiated that range from response inhibition and working memory to flexibility and metacognition. Thankfully you do not need a medical dictionary or neuroscience textbook to gain at least a perfunctory understanding of these 11 skills. The authors provide ample definitions along with corresponding examples to illustrate each skill's meaning and purpose. To simplify matters even more, their model and overall motis operandi for the book is based on two basic principle of learning. The first is an acknowledgement that most individuals have an array of that range from areas considered to be strengths to those that are less well developed or areas of weakness. Second, the authors rationalize that areas of weakness need to be identified so that intervention plans can be developed. The road to success is a combination of building and manipulating the environment so that problems related to skill weaknesses are minimized or prevented. The book itself is divided into three distinct but related sections. The first part promises to explain why you are smart but scattered. A tall order, indeed, but four chapters are all that is needed to identify individual strengths and weaknesses so that one can match the child to the task (p. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,441
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationMême sujetNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionTravaux en français237 207