MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W192947453

P. Dawson & R. Guare. (2009). Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary "Executive Skills" Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential

2009· article· en· W192947453 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tim Claypool

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredibilityDilemmaPsychologyWonderEconomic shortagePublic relationsSociologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P. Dawson & R. Guare. (2009). Smart But Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential. New York: The Guildford Press. 314 pages. ISBN: 978 1 59385 445 4 If you have stopped by your local bookstore lately, you may have noticed that there is no shortage of self-help books. Parents, in particular, are a vulnerable target audience for quasi-scientific writers aiming to offer anything from childrearing advice to boosting their children's brainpower. The book in question, Smart But Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential by Peg Dawson and Richard Guare falls within a unique subsection of this self-help/advice giving genre. It promises readers that it show you how you can modify the daily experience of a child aged 4 to 14 to build the that will make it possible for the child to get on track and get things done (p. 2). An attractive sales pitch indeed, without falling into the diagnostic dilemma of targeting only individuals with specific disorders of attention. Instead the authors choose to use a more inclusive approach, where prospective readers may be left wondering who would not benefit from boosting their own powers of self-control and organization, never mind their children's. The authors exude credibility, with Drs. Dawson and Guare reporting to have had over 30 years of field experience working with children who have difficulties with learning, attention, and behavior disorders. Not to diminish Peg Dawson's worthy accomplishments, it is comforting to note that Richard Guare is a neuropsychologist because their book addresses issues of functioning in general, and behavior paradigms in particular. Just so the reader does not confuse executive skills with preparing their child for life in the corporate world, the authors make it clear that they are referring to brain-based that are required for humans to execute, or perform tasks (p. 13). More specifically, their model is subdivided into a set of 11 developmentally and functionally differentiated that range from response inhibition and working memory to flexibility and metacognition. Thankfully you do not need a medical dictionary or neuroscience textbook to gain at least a perfunctory understanding of these 11 skills. The authors provide ample definitions along with corresponding examples to illustrate each skill's meaning and purpose. To simplify matters even more, their model and overall motis operandi for the book is based on two basic principle of learning. The first is an acknowledgement that most individuals have an array of that range from areas considered to be strengths to those that are less well developed or areas of weakness. Second, the authors rationalize that areas of weakness need to be identified so that intervention plans can be developed. The road to success is a combination of building and manipulating the environment so that problems related to skill weaknesses are minimized or prevented. The book itself is divided into three distinct but related sections. The first part promises to explain why you are smart but scattered. A tall order, indeed, but four chapters are all that is needed to identify individual strengths and weaknesses so that one can match the child to the task (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionFrench-language works237,207