Assessment of environmental issues of corporate social responsibility - results of empirical research
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose The main aim of this article is to analyse and evaluate the implementation of socially responsible activities by enterprises, in relation to the stakeholder group understood as the natural environment. Based on the results of surveys, the factors and tools for measuring the impact of socially responsible activities on the natural environment have been identified. Methodology The article presents the results of a survey on the impact of the activities carried out by socially responsible companies on the natural environment. The analysis covered primarily the issues related to the factors and tools measuring the impact of socially responsible activities in relation to the natural environment. The survey was conducted in 2013 among the organizational units implementing the concept of corporate social responsibility, having their headquarters in Poland. Following this study responses from 63 individuals were obtained, which provided a return rate of 21%. The largest group of companies surveyed included service companies (36.5%), industrial companies (31.7%), and trade companies (19.0%). Descriptive statistics and statistical inference were used for the analysis of the survey results. Results The conducted studies show that: 63.5% of surveyed companies conduct a regular measurement of the impact of the implementation of CSR activities on the natural environment, while 11.1% of the respondents perform such a measurement occasionally; 49.2% of surveyed companies use tools such as audits and impact assessment when examining the influence of CSR impact on the natural environment; the most frequently analysed factors taken into account when measuring the impact of CSR activities on the natural environment include: the amount of waste produced (66.7% of responses), the emission of gaseous pollutants into the air and the consumption of materials and raw materials (60.3% of responses). The theoretical contribution The concept of CSR is a business strategy, which allows a company to proactively manage the relationships with all relevant stakeholders understood as any entity that may affect the achievement of the objectives of the organization or any entity which is affected by the organization in the process of realizing their goals. [1] In terms of the theory of stakeholders, a company is treated as a non-profit organization whose goal is to maximize value for all of the stakeholders. [2] The following groups of the corporate social responsibility concept stakeholders can be distinguished: employees, local community, customers (customers / consumers of goods / services), contractors, natural environment. Thanks to these stakeholder groups, and for them, the company conducts business activities. The natural environment, as the so-called silent stakeholder, requires a different approach as it does not have neither a voice nor the right to vote. Nevertheless, it creates the scope for all human activity, also entrepreneurial. [3] The implementation of socially responsible activities results in the reduction of the negative impact on the environment through more efficient use of resources, reduced water consumption, lower waste disposal costs, savings from more efficient use and recovery of raw materials (lower material consumption and energy consumption). [4] Generally, it can be stated that between the company implementing socially responsible actions, and the silent stakeholder, there exists a kind of a feedback loop. The impact of the stakeholder changes the company, and the influence of the company changes the stakeholder. Practical implications Research results can be used by businesses, both those that are already implementing CSR activities, as well as those that are just planning it. They can be particularly useful for companies that are implementing environmental measures and are planning to extend them through the application of CSR activities. Keywords : corporate social responsibility, natural environment, measurement methods, measurement tools Paper type : Research paper [1] R.E. Freeman, Strategic management: A stakeholders approach , Pitman, Boston 1984 p. 46. [2] A. Adamska, Wlasnośc i kontrola. Perspektywa akcjonariuszy spolek publicznych , Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2013, p. 51. [3] R.C. Solomon, C. Martin, Above the Bottom Line. An Introduction to Business Ethics , Thomson Wadsworth, Toronto 2004, p. 301; M. Geryk, Spoleczna odpowiedzialnośc uczelni , Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2012, p. 43. [4] J. Klimek, Etyka biznesu. Teoretyczne zalozenia, praktyka zastosowan , Difin 2014, p. 282.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».