MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1934783126

Assessment of environmental issues of corporate social responsibility - results of empirical research

2015· article· en· W1934783126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agata Lulewicz-Sas, Joanna Godlewska

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational scientific conference "Economics and Management, ICEM" · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement Systems and Quality Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate social responsibilityBusinessStakeholderDescriptive statisticsSocial responsibilityAuditEnvironmental impact assessmentMarketingAccountingNatural (archaeology)Environmental resource managementPublic relationsGeographyEconomicsPolitical scienceStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose The main aim of this article is to analyse and evaluate the implementation of socially responsible activities by enterprises, in relation to the stakeholder group understood as the natural environment. Based on the results of surveys, the factors and tools for measuring the impact of socially responsible activities on the natural environment have been identified. Methodology The article presents the results of a survey on the impact of the activities carried out by socially responsible companies on the natural environment. The analysis covered primarily the issues related to the factors and tools measuring the impact of socially responsible activities in relation to the natural environment. The survey was conducted in 2013 among the organizational units implementing the concept of corporate social responsibility, having their headquarters in Poland. Following this study responses from 63 individuals were obtained, which provided a return rate of 21%. The largest group of companies surveyed included service companies (36.5%), industrial companies (31.7%), and trade companies (19.0%). Descriptive statistics and statistical inference were used for the analysis of the survey results. Results The conducted studies show that: 63.5% of surveyed companies conduct a regular measurement of the impact of the implementation of CSR activities on the natural environment, while 11.1% of the respondents perform such a measurement  occasionally; 49.2% of surveyed companies use tools such as audits and impact assessment when examining the influence of CSR impact on the natural environment; the most frequently analysed factors taken into account when measuring the impact of CSR activities on the natural environment include: the amount of waste produced (66.7% of responses), the emission of gaseous pollutants into the air and the consumption of materials and raw materials (60.3% of responses). The theoretical contribution The concept of CSR is a business strategy, which allows a company to proactively manage the relationships with all relevant stakeholders understood as any entity that may affect the achievement of the objectives of the organization or any entity which is affected by the organization in the process of realizing their goals. [1] In terms of the theory of stakeholders, a company is treated as a non-profit organization whose goal is to maximize value for all of the stakeholders. [2] The following groups of the corporate social responsibility concept stakeholders can be distinguished: employees, local community, customers (customers / consumers of goods / services), contractors, natural environment. Thanks to these stakeholder groups, and for them, the company conducts business activities. The natural environment, as the so-called silent stakeholder, requires a different approach as it does not have neither a voice nor the right to vote. Nevertheless, it creates the scope for all human activity, also entrepreneurial. [3] The implementation of socially responsible activities results in the reduction of the negative impact on the environment through more efficient use of resources, reduced water consumption, lower waste disposal costs, savings from more efficient use and recovery of raw materials (lower material consumption and energy consumption). [4] Generally, it can be stated that between the company implementing socially responsible actions, and the silent stakeholder, there exists a kind of a feedback loop. The impact of the stakeholder changes the company, and the influence of the company changes the stakeholder. Practical implications Research results can be used by businesses, both those that are already implementing CSR activities, as well as those that are just planning it. They can be particularly useful for companies that are implementing environmental measures and are planning to extend them through the application of CSR activities. Keywords : corporate social responsibility, natural environment, measurement methods, measurement tools Paper type : Research paper [1] R.E. Freeman, Strategic management: A stakeholders approach , Pitman, Boston 1984 p. 46. [2] A. Adamska, Wlasnośc i kontrola. Perspektywa akcjonariuszy spolek publicznych , Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2013, p. 51. [3] R.C. Solomon, C. Martin, Above the Bottom Line. An Introduction to Business Ethics , Thomson Wadsworth, Toronto 2004, p. 301; M. Geryk, Spoleczna odpowiedzialnośc uczelni , Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2012, p. 43. [4] J. Klimek, Etyka biznesu. Teoretyczne zalozenia, praktyka zastosowan , Difin 2014, p. 282.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.256
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational scientific conference "Economics and Management, ICEM"Same topicManagement Systems and Quality ImprovementFrench-language works237,207