MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1939968453 · doi:10.1115/1.4030133

Designing and Implementing a Portable Near-Infrared Imaging System for Monitoring of Human's Brain Functional Activity1

2015· article· en· W1939968453 sur OpenAlexaff
Y. Rakhshani Fatmehsari, Zahra Moussavi

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Medical Devices · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLight-emitting diodePhotodiodeWavelengthOptoelectronicsDiodeDetectorOpticsMaterials sciencePhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this study, we used eight photodiodes (OPT101, manufactured by Burr-Brown, Tucson, AZ, which is a monolithic photodiode with on-chip single supply amplifier) and three multiwavelength light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (L4*730/4*805/4*850-40Q96-I, manufactured by Epitex, Kyoto, Japan) [1]. These LEDs send three different wavelengths at 730, 805, 850 nm, in one package (we used two wavelengths 730 and 850 nm). Since each LED sends two wavelengths, we will need six drivers for three LEDs. However, we can design only one current source; thus, need to use an analog switch to select one of the LEDs to be fed by the constant current source. We used two single-pole/single-throw (SPST) analog switches.The ATMEGA328P-PU was used to select different LEDs and wavelengths and also to control the main board. Figure 1 shows the arrangement of LEDs and photo detectors [2]. The source-detector separation in our system is 2.5 cm. Using three LEDs and eight photo detectors, we will have 24 measurements resulting in 12 channels or voxels (V1–V12). Figure 2 shows how LEDs are sequentially turned on and off [2]. First, the 730 nm wavelength of S1 (first LED) is turned ON and the other two LEDs are OFF. In this case, we read from four photo detectors around S1, giving the first measurement for V1–V4. Next, the 730 nm wavelength turns OFF, the 850 nm wavelength of S1 turns ON, and readings from four photo detectors D1–D4 give the second measurement for V1–V4. Then, both wavelengths (all LEDs and all wavelengths) turn OFF. After 10 ms, the same procedure is repeated for S2 and the four photo detectors around it (D3–D6) resulting in two measurements for V5–V8. Finally, doing the same procedure for S3 and D5–D8 gives us the values for V9–V12. We continue this routine to measure near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data continuously. The duration of each wavelength emission is 10 ms.When one wavelength is ON, we read from four photo detectors simultaneously: D1–D4 for S1, D3–D6 for S2, and D5–D8 for S3. In order to switch between photo detectors, we used two multiplexers [1]. Each photo detector output is amplified and buffered followed by low pass filtering to remove high frequency noises. Finally, it is read by analog-to-digital convertor (ADC) of microcontroller. The low pass filter is a simple RC filter with cut-off frequency of 884.19 Hz. In order to record the NIRS measurements, the microcontroller sends the measurement values (read from ADCs) to a personal computer or laptop using a universal serial bus (USB) cable. Our imaging system (Fig. 3) uses rechargeable 3800 mAh Li-ion 12 V battery pack.To evaluate our designed system, we used two cognitive tasks to compare the functional brain activity during the tasks compared to rest state: the tasks were verbal fluency (VF) and color distinction (CD). In VF task (VFT), at first subjects were asked to close their eyes and recite the alphabets slowly to stabilize the prefrontal activity for 2 min; this was used as their rest state. Then, they were asked to open their eyes and upon seeing a letter on the laptop screen, say as many words as they could recall that started with the shown letter. The letter changed every 20 s; we used six letters of “F,” “A,” “S,” “P,” “G,” and “R” in that order. After 2 min of VFT, subjects were asked to close their eyes again and try to not think about anything and recite the alphabets slowly as the second rest state for 2 min. Each channels' signals were normalized to the range of [−1, +1]; then, averaged between the nine subjects who participated in this task.During CD task, a window of seven names of the colors was written with a different color as their names, and the subjects were instructed to name the color of the written color's name; for example, the word “blue” was written by color red and the subject was supposed to say the word “red” instead of reading the word “blue.” The task duration was 40 s, five subjects participated in this task.The results on average show that in both cognitive tasks in the first rest state, the changes in [HbO2], [HbR], and [HbT] are around baseline, but as the cognitive task began both [HbO2] and [HbT] increased and [HbR] decreased; this was expected. At the end of the task, when subjects closed their eyes and relaxed, all signals converged toward zero reaching the baseline (Fig. 4). This is consistent with results reported in Refs. [3–5]. Analysis for VF and CD tasks show that changes in concentration of deoxygenated hemoglobin have the lowest contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the largest time delay among three different types of hemoglobin signals. Changes in [HbO2] and [HbT] had almost the same values for CNR but [HbO2] changes were faster in response to brain functional activity (smaller time delays). Also, for statistical analysis we ran paired t-test for data of each channel (rest versus task) and it showed the difference between hemodynamic signals of rest state and those of task state were significant (p < 9.9 × 10−11) in all 12 channels and for all three hemoglobin signals and in both cognitive tasks. Furthermore, there was no laterality in VFT and nor in CD task (p > 0.05) in none of the three hemoglobin signals, which is consistent with the results reported in Refs. [5,6].In conclusion, our continuous wave (CW)-NIRS system has passed the initial evaluation by two common cognitive tasks with a good accuracy as expected. As the results show, our imaging system is able to detect brain functional activities of the prefrontal cortex. Most commercially available NIRS systems are big and are not portable and they are expensive. As our system is relatively easy to use and it is portable and wearable, battery operated, and affordable, it may be useful in bed monitoring studies or gait and balance studies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,602
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,323

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,376
Écart entre enseignants0,331 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Medical DevicesMême sujetOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesTravaux en français237 207