MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1939968453 · doi:10.1115/1.4030133

Designing and Implementing a Portable Near-Infrared Imaging System for Monitoring of Human's Brain Functional Activity1

2015· article· en· W1939968453 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Rakhshani Fatmehsari, Zahra Moussavi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Devices · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLight-emitting diodePhotodiodeWavelengthOptoelectronicsDiodeDetectorOpticsMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we used eight photodiodes (OPT101, manufactured by Burr-Brown, Tucson, AZ, which is a monolithic photodiode with on-chip single supply amplifier) and three multiwavelength light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (L4*730/4*805/4*850-40Q96-I, manufactured by Epitex, Kyoto, Japan) [1]. These LEDs send three different wavelengths at 730, 805, 850 nm, in one package (we used two wavelengths 730 and 850 nm). Since each LED sends two wavelengths, we will need six drivers for three LEDs. However, we can design only one current source; thus, need to use an analog switch to select one of the LEDs to be fed by the constant current source. We used two single-pole/single-throw (SPST) analog switches.The ATMEGA328P-PU was used to select different LEDs and wavelengths and also to control the main board. Figure 1 shows the arrangement of LEDs and photo detectors [2]. The source-detector separation in our system is 2.5 cm. Using three LEDs and eight photo detectors, we will have 24 measurements resulting in 12 channels or voxels (V1–V12). Figure 2 shows how LEDs are sequentially turned on and off [2]. First, the 730 nm wavelength of S1 (first LED) is turned ON and the other two LEDs are OFF. In this case, we read from four photo detectors around S1, giving the first measurement for V1–V4. Next, the 730 nm wavelength turns OFF, the 850 nm wavelength of S1 turns ON, and readings from four photo detectors D1–D4 give the second measurement for V1–V4. Then, both wavelengths (all LEDs and all wavelengths) turn OFF. After 10 ms, the same procedure is repeated for S2 and the four photo detectors around it (D3–D6) resulting in two measurements for V5–V8. Finally, doing the same procedure for S3 and D5–D8 gives us the values for V9–V12. We continue this routine to measure near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data continuously. The duration of each wavelength emission is 10 ms.When one wavelength is ON, we read from four photo detectors simultaneously: D1–D4 for S1, D3–D6 for S2, and D5–D8 for S3. In order to switch between photo detectors, we used two multiplexers [1]. Each photo detector output is amplified and buffered followed by low pass filtering to remove high frequency noises. Finally, it is read by analog-to-digital convertor (ADC) of microcontroller. The low pass filter is a simple RC filter with cut-off frequency of 884.19 Hz. In order to record the NIRS measurements, the microcontroller sends the measurement values (read from ADCs) to a personal computer or laptop using a universal serial bus (USB) cable. Our imaging system (Fig. 3) uses rechargeable 3800 mAh Li-ion 12 V battery pack.To evaluate our designed system, we used two cognitive tasks to compare the functional brain activity during the tasks compared to rest state: the tasks were verbal fluency (VF) and color distinction (CD). In VF task (VFT), at first subjects were asked to close their eyes and recite the alphabets slowly to stabilize the prefrontal activity for 2 min; this was used as their rest state. Then, they were asked to open their eyes and upon seeing a letter on the laptop screen, say as many words as they could recall that started with the shown letter. The letter changed every 20 s; we used six letters of “F,” “A,” “S,” “P,” “G,” and “R” in that order. After 2 min of VFT, subjects were asked to close their eyes again and try to not think about anything and recite the alphabets slowly as the second rest state for 2 min. Each channels' signals were normalized to the range of [−1, +1]; then, averaged between the nine subjects who participated in this task.During CD task, a window of seven names of the colors was written with a different color as their names, and the subjects were instructed to name the color of the written color's name; for example, the word “blue” was written by color red and the subject was supposed to say the word “red” instead of reading the word “blue.” The task duration was 40 s, five subjects participated in this task.The results on average show that in both cognitive tasks in the first rest state, the changes in [HbO2], [HbR], and [HbT] are around baseline, but as the cognitive task began both [HbO2] and [HbT] increased and [HbR] decreased; this was expected. At the end of the task, when subjects closed their eyes and relaxed, all signals converged toward zero reaching the baseline (Fig. 4). This is consistent with results reported in Refs. [3–5]. Analysis for VF and CD tasks show that changes in concentration of deoxygenated hemoglobin have the lowest contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the largest time delay among three different types of hemoglobin signals. Changes in [HbO2] and [HbT] had almost the same values for CNR but [HbO2] changes were faster in response to brain functional activity (smaller time delays). Also, for statistical analysis we ran paired t-test for data of each channel (rest versus task) and it showed the difference between hemodynamic signals of rest state and those of task state were significant (p < 9.9 × 10−11) in all 12 channels and for all three hemoglobin signals and in both cognitive tasks. Furthermore, there was no laterality in VFT and nor in CD task (p > 0.05) in none of the three hemoglobin signals, which is consistent with the results reported in Refs. [5,6].In conclusion, our continuous wave (CW)-NIRS system has passed the initial evaluation by two common cognitive tasks with a good accuracy as expected. As the results show, our imaging system is able to detect brain functional activities of the prefrontal cortex. Most commercially available NIRS systems are big and are not portable and they are expensive. As our system is relatively easy to use and it is portable and wearable, battery operated, and affordable, it may be useful in bed monitoring studies or gait and balance studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical DevicesSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207