Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Even though over 40% of the population in the world live under the system of federalism, there are few studies on federalism in Korea. The federalism studies in Korea to this day can be classified into the following four categories; First, federalism studies for the purpose of unification of north and south Korea. Second, introductions of foreign federalism in order to use it as basic materials for diplomatic relationships or business with other countries. Most of these introductions are just superficial. Third, federalism studies for the fulfillment of academic interests. Fourth, federalism studies for the purpose of political reform and decentralization in Korea. The second chapter deals with the meanings of federalism. It is impossible to define federalism clearly because there are so many different definitions about federalism among scholars over the world. Therefore, this study tries to explain five elements of federalism instead defining it. Federalism is compared to confederation and unitary state to make it easy to understand. Also, the relations between federalism and decentralization are added. Usually federal nations are more decentralized than unitary state, but it is not always right. In certain circumstances decentralized unitary state can be more decentralized than centralized federal nations. The third chapter deals with principles of federalism for its positive function, theoretical backgrounds of federalism and types of federalism. The principles of federalism are self-determination, codetermination and cooperation. The types of federalism are as followed: Separation-model and combination-model according to relations between administrative power and legislative power, competitive federalism and cooperative federalism according to the relations between central state and regional state, symmetrical federalism and asymmetrical federalism. Also, there are two different theoretical tradition in federalism: american federalism and european federalism. The fourth chapter deals with concrete systems of federalism in several nations; their formation, constitutional guarantee, dividing powers, participation of states in federation, financial distribution, the second chamber as representation of regional interest etc. At first, the system of federal nations with american federalism tradition(USA, Canada, Australia) are introduced. The fathers of american constitution were the creators of modern federalism. Before it, there were only two types of political system; confederation and unitary state. Canada begins with strong centralized federalism but through judicial interpretation of constitution, states gained much more power than before. In Australia, the High Court has strong influence on the relation between central government and regional government. Through the High Court, the central government gradually gets more power. Then the systems of federal nations with european tradition(Germany, Swiss, Spain) are explained. Gemany has long history of confederation under rule of the Holy Roman Empire. After the Second World War, in Germany federal state was built to overcome dictatorship which was made in the era of Nazism. Recently German federalism was reformed through constitutional amendment in 2006. The purpose of the reform was to change cooperative federalism to competitive federalism but it was not so much successful. The spanish federalism is very unique. Some scholars say Spain is federal state, others disagree with them. In the fifth chapter, the distribution of powers and finance are dealt in detail. In the sixth chapter the second chamber is explained. The seventh chapter discusses the meanings of federalism to overcome Korean problems. In the discussion of decentralization in Korea federalism can give some important implications since particularly legislative decentralization is required for Korean political reform. This study offers an important clue for unification of Korea. With 3-10 regional governments in each South and North Korea can be accomplished Korean unification in the form of federation. A federation with only 2 regional governments is usually unstable. To cope with conflicts and problems among regions in Korea, federalism can be a solution.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».