MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1952989383 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab34

34 EFFECT OF GENOTYPE AND CELL LINE ON THE EFFICIENCY OF LIVE CALF PRODUCTION BY SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER

2004· article· en· W1952989383 sur OpenAlexafffund
K. Delegge, Marc Peter Maserati, Nicole Kieser, D. Delanski, Boyd Henderson, T. Dobbie, J. Middour, Javier Tapia Balladares, Raymond Page

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Mots-clésCell cultureSomatic cell nuclear transferIonomycinBiologySomatic cellCell fusionCellAndrologyCycloheximideGenotypeMolecular biologyCell biologyEmbryoGeneticsBlastocystIn vitroMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The efficiency of production of live calves using somatic cell nuclear transfer was compared among 52 different cell lines representing 43 different genotypes. Cell lines were not genetically modified. Nuclear transfer was performed according to methods described by Cibelli et al., 1998 Science 280, 1256–1258, with modifications. All cells were derived from either explant cultures or enzyme digests of skin biopsies and were cyropreserved and thawed at least 48 hours prior to nuclear transfer. Cells were harvested using either pronase or trypsin at 70 to 90% confluence. Oocytes were either activated prior to fusion or immediately after fusion using ionomycin. The couplets were then cultured in cycloheximide and cytochalsin B for 6 hours. In 36 cases (84%), at least one healthy calf was produced from the initial trial which included transfer to 10 to 20 recipients for each cell line. For 4 of the 7 cases where the initial cell line failed to produce a live calf, a new cell line was derived and the process repeated. In one case where the data are available from the second cell line, 5 live calves were produced from 20 recipients receiving embryos (25%). Results from the other repeated cell lines are pending. For 5 of the different genotypes, nuclear transfer was done at about the same time using two different cell lines, and 4 of these have produced healthy calves from both cell lines. In one case, one cell line produced live calves, and no calves were produced from the other cell line. In total, 167 calves were born, of which 107 are alive and healthy as of this writing (64%), and range in age from 1 to 25 months. There are 86 calves older than 6 months of age and no losses have occurred as calves have aged into early adulthood. Forty-four (26%) of the calves were stillborn, failed to convert to neonatal circulation or were euthanized within 48 hours of birth. The most frequent reason for euthanasia was severe contracture of the limbs (arthrogryposis). This defect occurred even within cell lines that also gave rise to healthy calves, although it was more prevalent with certain cell lines. Other complications among the normal calves born were those of an abnormally large umbilicus or umbilical vessels. In addition, 16 calves were lost after the first 48 hours (13%). Two of these losses were due to accidents and 9 of them were due to complications from umbilical infections. The other 5 calf loses resulted from complications common to young calves such as clostridial infection and ruptured abomasum. Recent improvements in cell line derivation and embryo culture techniques, as well as a higher incidence of natural birth and improved neonatal management, have resulted in healthy calf production efficiencies (from embryos transferred) greater than 30% for 5 independent genotypes. The number of healthy calves produced per embryo transferred was 11 of 20 (55%), 5 of 10 (50%), 5 of 10 (50%), 4 of 11 (36%), and 3 of 10 (30%), for each of these genotypes, respectively. There was no correlation between the efficiency of blastocyst production and pregnancy outcome for the cell lines evaluated in this study. In conclusion, the efficiency of live healthy calf production using somatic cell nuclear transfer remains variable, depending on both the cell line and the genotype. However, efficiencies approaching those obtained using conventional embryo transfer is possible.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,201
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentMême sujetAnimal Genetics and ReproductionTravaux en français237 207