MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1952989383 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab34

34 EFFECT OF GENOTYPE AND CELL LINE ON THE EFFICIENCY OF LIVE CALF PRODUCTION BY SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER

2004· article· en· W1952989383 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Delegge, Marc Peter Maserati, Nicole Kieser, D. Delanski, Boyd Henderson, T. Dobbie, J. Middour, Javier Tapia Balladares, Raymond Page

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsCell cultureSomatic cell nuclear transferIonomycinBiologySomatic cellCell fusionCellAndrologyCycloheximideGenotypeMolecular biologyCell biologyEmbryoGeneticsBlastocystIn vitroMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficiency of production of live calves using somatic cell nuclear transfer was compared among 52 different cell lines representing 43 different genotypes. Cell lines were not genetically modified. Nuclear transfer was performed according to methods described by Cibelli et al., 1998 Science 280, 1256–1258, with modifications. All cells were derived from either explant cultures or enzyme digests of skin biopsies and were cyropreserved and thawed at least 48 hours prior to nuclear transfer. Cells were harvested using either pronase or trypsin at 70 to 90% confluence. Oocytes were either activated prior to fusion or immediately after fusion using ionomycin. The couplets were then cultured in cycloheximide and cytochalsin B for 6 hours. In 36 cases (84%), at least one healthy calf was produced from the initial trial which included transfer to 10 to 20 recipients for each cell line. For 4 of the 7 cases where the initial cell line failed to produce a live calf, a new cell line was derived and the process repeated. In one case where the data are available from the second cell line, 5 live calves were produced from 20 recipients receiving embryos (25%). Results from the other repeated cell lines are pending. For 5 of the different genotypes, nuclear transfer was done at about the same time using two different cell lines, and 4 of these have produced healthy calves from both cell lines. In one case, one cell line produced live calves, and no calves were produced from the other cell line. In total, 167 calves were born, of which 107 are alive and healthy as of this writing (64%), and range in age from 1 to 25 months. There are 86 calves older than 6 months of age and no losses have occurred as calves have aged into early adulthood. Forty-four (26%) of the calves were stillborn, failed to convert to neonatal circulation or were euthanized within 48 hours of birth. The most frequent reason for euthanasia was severe contracture of the limbs (arthrogryposis). This defect occurred even within cell lines that also gave rise to healthy calves, although it was more prevalent with certain cell lines. Other complications among the normal calves born were those of an abnormally large umbilicus or umbilical vessels. In addition, 16 calves were lost after the first 48 hours (13%). Two of these losses were due to accidents and 9 of them were due to complications from umbilical infections. The other 5 calf loses resulted from complications common to young calves such as clostridial infection and ruptured abomasum. Recent improvements in cell line derivation and embryo culture techniques, as well as a higher incidence of natural birth and improved neonatal management, have resulted in healthy calf production efficiencies (from embryos transferred) greater than 30% for 5 independent genotypes. The number of healthy calves produced per embryo transferred was 11 of 20 (55%), 5 of 10 (50%), 5 of 10 (50%), 4 of 11 (36%), and 3 of 10 (30%), for each of these genotypes, respectively. There was no correlation between the efficiency of blastocyst production and pregnancy outcome for the cell lines evaluated in this study. In conclusion, the efficiency of live healthy calf production using somatic cell nuclear transfer remains variable, depending on both the cell line and the genotype. However, efficiencies approaching those obtained using conventional embryo transfer is possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207