MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1955479008 · doi:10.1139/jpn.0729

Using psychostimulants for treating residual symptoms in major depression

2007· article· en· W1955479008 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marcelo T. Berlim, Gustavo Turecki

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTreatment of Major Depression
Établissements canadiensDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVenlafaxineModafinilReboxetineReuptake inhibitorMirtazapinePsychologyDextroamphetamineMedicineMethylphenidateAntidepressantInternal medicinePsychiatryDopamineAmphetamineAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderAnxiety

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mrs. N. is a 44-year-old nurse with major depression who only had a partial response to venlafaxine 300 mg / day taken for 6 months. Upon referral, her symptoms were of mild-to-moderate intensity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D17] = 14). When interviewed, Ms. N. complained mostly of anergia, fatigue, and hypersomnia (12–16 hr/d sleeping), but denied the presence of depressive mood. She was then started on modafinil 100 mg twice daily and showed a 30% improvement within 3 days. After 1 week of treatment, her HAM-D17 had decreased to 5 (i.e., remission of symptoms) and she was sleeping an average of 6–8 hours per night. As shown by the clinical vignette, psychostimulants are being increasingly used as augmentation agents for conventional antidepressant drugs, particularly given their usually rapid onset of action (normally within 48 hr) and relative lack of major side effects (Huffman and Stern, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2004;6:44-6). The most commonly used stimulants are dextroamphetamine (10–40 mg/d) and methylphenidate (10–60 mg/d). Other more recent alternatives include atomoxetine (a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor used in doses of 40–120 mg/d) and pramipexole (a dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist used in doses of 0.25–1 mg 3 times daily). This class of dopaminergic or noradrenergic agonists and reuptake inhibitors has produced interesting results in small open trials with subjects with depression resistant to tricyclics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (Fava, J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62[Suppl 18]:4-11). However, to date, there are no controlled double-blind data on the effectiveness of these augmenting agents in treatment-resistant depression and, accordingly, they are not currently approved by the FDA for this indication. Modafinil, a novel psychostimulant, has shown promising results (in doses up to 200 mg twice daily) in the management of residual symptoms of depression. Indeed, a preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week study involving 118 depression subjects (using a wide range of antidepressant drugs) found that modafinil rapidly improved fatigue (p < 0.05) and daytime sleepiness (p < 0.01), although no significant differences were found between modafinil and placebo at end point (DeBattista et al, J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:1057-64). A subsequent, placebo-controlled multicentre study in 311 patients with depression using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) monotherapy showed that modafinil (v. placebo) significantly improved patients' overall clinical condition, compared with placebo (p = 0.02). Only nausea and jitteriness were significantly more common with modafinil than with placebo (Fava et al, J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:85-93). A small, open-label study of modafinil in 29 subjects with depression receiving either paroxetine or fluoxetine has also suggested its potential usefulness in accelerating response and enhancing the chances of achieving remission (Ninan et al, J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:414-20). Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of modafinil in major depression. Typical side effects of psychostimulants are usually of mild-to-moderate intensity (reversible with drug discontinuation) and may include insomnia, exacerbation of anxiety or agitation, tremor, changes in appetite and palpitations (Huffman and Stern, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2004;6:44-6). Importantly, cardiovascular complications have not been prominent (even among patients with preexisting cardiac disease). Further, there is currently little evidence for habit formation or addiction (Fava and Rush, Psychother Psychosom 2006;75:139-53). Some relatively contraindicated conditions for the use of psychostimulants include recent myocardial infarction, ongoing congestive heart failure, history of ventricular arrhythmia and hyperdynamic states (e.g., hyperthyroidism). Finally, their administration should be avoided in patients who have been treated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors in the previous 2 weeks and during pregnancy (for lack of safety data in humans). In summary, although some trials have demonstrated benefits of psychostimulants as augmenting agents to standard antidepressant drugs, more rigorous controlled studies are needed before their routine use can be recommended. Moreover, the optimal duration for this augmentation remains to be determined. Marcelo T. Berlim, MD Gustavo Turecki, MD, PhD Depressive Disorders Program and McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Que.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,362
Écart entre enseignants0,325 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2007
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceMême sujetTreatment of Major DepressionTravaux en français237 207